[PATCH v3 16/55] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add IRQ sorting
Andre Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Fri May 6 03:45:29 PDT 2016
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>
Adds the sorting function to cover the case where you have more IRQs
to consider than you have LRs. We now consider priorities.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index 92b78a0..4fb20fd 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/kvm.h>
#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include <linux/list_sort.h>
#include "vgic.h"
@@ -96,6 +97,62 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vgic_target_oracle(struct vgic_irq *irq)
}
/*
+ * The order of items in the ap_lists defines how we'll pack things in LRs as
+ * well, the first items in the list being the first things populated in the
+ * LRs.
+ *
+ * A hard rule is that active interrupts can never be pushed out of the LRs
+ * (and therefore take priority) since we cannot reliably trap on deactivation
+ * of IRQs and therefore they have to be present in the LRs.
+ *
+ * Otherwise things should be sorted by the priority field and the GIC
+ * hardware support will take care of preemption of priority groups etc.
+ *
+ * Return negative if "a" sorts before "b", 0 to preserve order, and positive
+ * to sort "b" before "a".
+ */
+static int vgic_irq_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b)
+{
+ struct vgic_irq *irqa = container_of(a, struct vgic_irq, ap_list);
+ struct vgic_irq *irqb = container_of(b, struct vgic_irq, ap_list);
+ bool penda, pendb;
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock(&irqa->irq_lock);
+ spin_lock(&irqb->irq_lock);
+
+ if (irqa->active || irqb->active) {
+ ret = (int)irqb->active - (int)irqa->active;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ penda = irqa->enabled && irqa->pending;
+ pendb = irqb->enabled && irqb->pending;
+
+ if (!penda || !pendb) {
+ ret = (int)pendb - (int)penda;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Both pending and enabled, sort by priority */
+ ret = irqa->priority - irqb->priority;
+out:
+ spin_unlock(&irqb->irq_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&irqa->irq_lock);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/* Must be called with the ap_list_lock held */
+static void vgic_sort_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
+
+ DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock));
+
+ list_sort(NULL, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, vgic_irq_cmp);
+}
+
+/*
* Only valid injection if changing level for level-triggered IRQs or for a
* rising edge.
*/
--
2.7.3
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list