[PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range
linux at roeck-us.net
Thu May 5 17:18:20 PDT 2016
On 05/05/2016 04:45 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Timur Tabi wrote:
>>> A 32-bit counter is absolutely fine. Letting it run with a 400MHz clock
>>> (or was it 200 MHz ?) is the problem. A resolution of 2.5ns for a
>>> timer does not really make any sense.
>> The 10 second limit is based on a 20MHz clock.
> No, that's not true. I misread the code. I knew something was wrong, but it didn't click until just now.
> The default timeout is 10 seconds. The max timeout on a 20MHz system (which is what we're running) is over 200 seconds.
> The problem is that Pratyush's system is running at a clock that's way too fast:
> [ 131.187562] sbsa-gwdt sbsa-gwdt.0: Initialized with 40s timeout @ 250000000 Hz, action=1.
> 250MHz is unreasonable. Pratyush, why is your system counter so high? On our ARM64 system, it's set to 20MHz.
Guess that answers my earlier question. Problem is that the specification
_permits_ those unreasonable frequencies, and quite obviously they are
being used, no matter if it makes sense or not.
With a (still unreasonable) maximum frequency of 100 MHz, the problem
would not exist. So, if anything, someone with influence on the standard
might suggest to reduce the maximum permitted frequency.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel