[PATCH v8 6/8] irqchip/gicv2m: implement msi_doorbell_info callback
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Wed May 4 06:02:23 PDT 2016
On 28/04/16 09:22, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch implements the msi_doorbell_info callback in the
> gicv2m driver.
>
> The driver now is able to return its doorbell characteristics
> (base, size, prot). A single doorbell is exposed.
>
> This will allow the msi layer to iommu_map this doorbell when
> requested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at linaro.org>
>
> ---
>
> v7 -> v8:
> - gicv2m_msi_doorbell_info does not return a pointer to const
> - remove spurious !v2m check
> - add IOMMU_MMIO flag
>
> v7: creation
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
> index 28f047c..a1ea40c 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> #include <linux/of_pci.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/iommu.h>
>
> /*
> * MSI_TYPER:
> @@ -64,6 +66,7 @@ struct v2m_data {
> u32 nr_spis; /* The number of SPIs for MSIs */
> unsigned long *bm; /* MSI vector bitmap */
> u32 flags; /* v2m flags for specific implementation */
> + struct irq_chip_msi_doorbell_info doorbell_info;
> };
>
> static void gicv2m_mask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> @@ -105,6 +108,14 @@ static void gicv2m_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
> msg->data -= v2m->spi_start;
> }
>
> +static inline struct irq_chip_msi_doorbell_info *
You do not need an inline here, specially given that you're assigning
its pointer to a structure just below.
> +gicv2m_msi_doorbell_info(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct v2m_data *v2m = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + return &v2m->doorbell_info;
> +}
> +
> static struct irq_chip gicv2m_irq_chip = {
> .name = "GICv2m",
> .irq_mask = irq_chip_mask_parent,
> @@ -112,6 +123,7 @@ static struct irq_chip gicv2m_irq_chip = {
> .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent,
> .irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
> .irq_compose_msi_msg = gicv2m_compose_msi_msg,
> + .msi_doorbell_info = gicv2m_msi_doorbell_info,
> };
>
> static int gicv2m_irq_gic_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
> @@ -247,6 +259,7 @@ static void gicv2m_teardown(void)
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(v2m, tmp, &v2m_nodes, entry) {
> list_del(&v2m->entry);
> + free_percpu(v2m->doorbell_info.percpu_doorbells);
> kfree(v2m->bm);
> iounmap(v2m->base);
> of_node_put(to_of_node(v2m->fwnode));
> @@ -299,6 +312,7 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> {
> int ret;
> struct v2m_data *v2m;
> + phys_addr_t __percpu *doorbell;
>
> v2m = kzalloc(sizeof(struct v2m_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!v2m) {
> @@ -311,11 +325,23 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>
> memcpy(&v2m->res, res, sizeof(struct resource));
>
> + v2m->doorbell_info.percpu_doorbells =
> + alloc_percpu(phys_addr_t);
> + if (WARN_ON(!v2m->doorbell_info.percpu_doorbells)) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_free_v2m;
> + }
> + doorbell = per_cpu_ptr(v2m->doorbell_info.percpu_doorbells, 0);
> + *doorbell = v2m->res.start;
> + v2m->doorbell_info.size = 4;
> + v2m->doorbell_info.prot = IOMMU_WRITE | IOMMU_MMIO;
> + v2m->doorbell_info.nb_doorbells = 1;
So if you take my earlier suggestion, this becomes:
v2m->doorbell_info.global_doorbell = v2m->res.start;
v2m->doorbell_info.size = sizeof(u32);
v2m->doorbell_info.doorbell_is_percpu = false;
a bit nicer.
> +
> v2m->base = ioremap(v2m->res.start, resource_size(&v2m->res));
> if (!v2m->base) {
> pr_err("Failed to map GICv2m resource\n");
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto err_free_v2m;
> + goto err_free_v2m_doorbells;
> }
>
> if (spi_start && nr_spis) {
> @@ -359,6 +385,8 @@ static int __init gicv2m_init_one(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>
> err_iounmap:
> iounmap(v2m->base);
> +err_free_v2m_doorbells:
> + free_percpu(v2m->doorbell_info.percpu_doorbells);
> err_free_v2m:
> kfree(v2m);
> return ret;
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list