[PATCH RFC] Watchdog: sbsa_gwdt: Enhance timeout range
panand at redhat.com
Tue May 3 08:51:41 PDT 2016
On 03/05/2016:10:07:48 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Pratyush Anand wrote:
> >In fact after supporting max_hw_heartbeat_ms, there should be no change for
> >action=0 functionally. However, we would still need some changes for action=1.
> IMHO, action=1 is more of a debugging option, and not something that would
> be used normally. I would need to see some evidence that real users want to
> have action=1 and a longer timeout.
If action=1 need to be used effectively, then we should have something which
would help to increase timeout values.
Currently you have only 10 second to execute secondary kernel, which might not
> I've never been a fan of the action=1 option, and I'm certainly not keen any
> patches that make action=1 more complicated than it already is.
I think, with max_hw_heartbeat_ms it would be far more simpler. Will attempt and
send another RFC.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel