[PATCH 3/7] reset: lpc18xx: use devm_reset_controller_register()
Philipp Zabel
p.zabel at pengutronix.de
Mon May 2 01:26:21 PDT 2016
Am Sonntag, den 01.05.2016, 19:36 +0900 schrieb Masahiro Yamada:
> Use devm_reset_controller_register() for the reset controller
> registration and remove the unregister call from the .remove callback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c b/drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c
> index 3b8a4f5..dd4f27e 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-lpc18xx.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int lpc18xx_rgu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rc);
>
> - ret = reset_controller_register(&rc->rcdev);
> + ret = devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &rc->rcdev);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to register device\n");
> goto dis_clks;
> @@ -229,8 +229,6 @@ static int lpc18xx_rgu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to unregister restart handler\n");
>
> - reset_controller_unregister(&rc->rcdev);
> -
> clk_disable_unprepare(rc->clk_delay);
> clk_disable_unprepare(rc->clk_reg);
>
Hmm, would this patch theoretically allow a window between the calls to
clk_disable_unprepare(clk_reg) and devm_reset_controller_release() where
reset_control_get() + reset_control_(de)assert() would access unclocked
registers?
regards
Philipp
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list