[PATCH 1/1] ARM : missing corrupted reg in __do_div_asm
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Tue Mar 29 03:19:49 PDT 2016
On Monday 28 March 2016 12:19:03 Chen Gang wrote:
> __xl(R0 in little endian system, or R1 in big endian system) is corrupted
> after calling __do_div64 and compiler is not informed about this in
> macro __do_div_asm. If n is used again afterwards, __xl won't be
> reloaded and n will contain incorrect value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gangchen at rdamicro.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <chengang.beijing at gmail.com>
> ---
How did you find this? Did you run into this problem on a live system
or see it through inspection?
> arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> index e1f0776..1a6e91a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
> @@ -35,12 +35,14 @@ static inline uint32_t __div64_32(uint64_t *n, uint32_t base)
> register unsigned long long __n asm("r0") = *n;
> register unsigned long long __res asm("r2");
> register unsigned int __rem asm(__xh);
> + register unsigned int __clobber asm(__xl);
> asm( __asmeq("%0", __xh)
> __asmeq("%1", "r2")
> + __asmeq("%3", "r0")
> + __asmeq("%4", "r4")
> __asmeq("%2", "r0")
> - __asmeq("%3", "r4")
> "bl __do_div64"
> - : "=r" (__rem), "=r" (__res)
> + : "=r" (__rem), "=r" (__res), "=r" (__clobber)
> : "r" (__n), "r" (__base)
> : "ip", "lr", "cc");
> *n = __res;
Doesn't the clobber normally go in the third line along with
"ip" and "lr"?
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list