[PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: imx6: Fix procedure to switch the parent of LDB_DI_CLK
Fabio Estevam
festevam at gmail.com
Mon Mar 28 12:33:11 PDT 2016
Hi Akshay,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Akshay Bhat <akshay.bhat at timesys.com> wrote:
> The 2 discrepancies I see with this patch with regards to the sequence from
> NXP 3.10 kernel are:
>
> 1. NXP 3.10 kernel switches clock source as follows:
> current_parent -> 7 -> 4 -> new_parent
Yes, we need to follow this requirement.
>
> Ref:
> + /*
> + * Set the ldb_di0_clk and ldb_di1_clk to 111b.
> + */
> + reg = readl_relaxed(ccm_base + 0x2c);
> + reg |= ((7 << 9) | (7 << 12));
> + writel_relaxed(reg, ccm_base + 0x2c);
> +
> + /*
> + * Set the ldb_di0_clk and ldb_di1_clk to 100b.
> + */
> + reg = readl_relaxed(ccm_base + 0x2c);
> + reg &= ~((7 << 9) | (7 << 12));
> + reg |= ((4 << 9) | (4 << 12));
> + writel_relaxed(reg, ccm_base + 0x2c);
> +
> + /*
> + * Perform the LDB parent clock switch.
> + */
> + clk_set_parent(clk[ldb_di0_sel], clk[new_parent]);
> + clk_set_parent(clk[ldb_di1_sel], clk[new_parent]);
>
>
> If I am reading this patch correctly, then this patch does:
> current_parent -> (current_parent | 4) -> (new_parent | 4) -> new_parent
>
> Ref:
> + /* First switch to the bottom mux */
> + sel[i][1] = sel[i][0] | 4;
> +
> + /* Then configure the top mux before switching back to it */
> + sel[i][2] = sel[i][3] | 4;
> +
> + pr_debug("ccm: switching ldb_di%d_sel: %d->%d->%d->%d\n", i,
> + sel[i][0], sel[i][1], sel[i][2], sel[i][3]);
>
>
> 2. The NXP 3.10 kernel does not have any restriction on what the new parent
> is.
That's correct. There is no restriction on what the new parent will be.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list