[RFC PATCH 18/45] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add ACTIVE registers handlers
Andre Przywara
andre.przywara at arm.com
Thu Mar 24 19:04:41 PDT 2016
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c
index 788e186..bfc530c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic_mmio.c
@@ -289,6 +289,83 @@ static int vgic_mmio_write_cpending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return 0;
}
+static int vgic_mmio_read_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct kvm_io_device *this,
+ gpa_t addr, int len, void *val)
+{
+ struct vgic_io_device *iodev = container_of(this,
+ struct vgic_io_device, dev);
+ u32 intid = (addr - iodev->base_addr) * 8;
+ u32 value = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ if (iodev->redist_vcpu)
+ vcpu = iodev->redist_vcpu;
+
+ /* Loop over all IRQs affected by this read */
+ for (i = 0; i < len * 8; i++) {
+ struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
+
+ spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
+ if (irq->active)
+ value |= (1U << i);
+ spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
+ }
+
+ write_mask32(value, addr & 3, len, val);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int vgic_mmio_write_cactive(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct kvm_io_device *this,
+ gpa_t addr, int len, const void *val)
+{
+ struct vgic_io_device *iodev = container_of(this,
+ struct vgic_io_device, dev);
+ u32 intid = (addr - iodev->base_addr) * 8;
+ int i;
+
+ if (iodev->redist_vcpu)
+ vcpu = iodev->redist_vcpu;
+
+ for_each_set_bit(i, val, len * 8) {
+ struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
+
+ spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
+
+ irq->active = false;
+ /* TODO: Anything more to do? Does flush/sync cover this? */
+
+ spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int vgic_mmio_write_sactive(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ struct kvm_io_device *this,
+ gpa_t addr, int len, const void *val)
+{
+ struct vgic_io_device *iodev = container_of(this,
+ struct vgic_io_device, dev);
+ u32 intid = (addr - iodev->base_addr) * 8;
+ int i;
+
+ if (iodev->redist_vcpu)
+ vcpu = iodev->redist_vcpu;
+
+ for_each_set_bit(i, val, len * 8) {
+ struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
+
+ spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
+
+ irq->active = true;
+ /* TODO: Anything more to do? Does flush/sync cover this? */
+
+ spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int vgic_mmio_read_priority(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_io_device *this,
gpa_t addr, int len, void *val)
@@ -347,9 +424,9 @@ struct vgic_register_region vgic_v2_dist_registers[] = {
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ(GIC_DIST_PENDING_CLEAR,
vgic_mmio_read_pending, vgic_mmio_write_cpending, 1),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ(GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_SET,
- vgic_mmio_read_nyi, vgic_mmio_write_nyi, 1),
+ vgic_mmio_read_active, vgic_mmio_write_sactive, 1),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ(GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_CLEAR,
- vgic_mmio_read_nyi, vgic_mmio_write_nyi, 1),
+ vgic_mmio_read_active, vgic_mmio_write_cactive, 1),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ(GIC_DIST_PRI,
vgic_mmio_read_priority, vgic_mmio_write_priority, 8),
REGISTER_DESC_WITH_BITS_PER_IRQ(GIC_DIST_TARGET,
--
2.7.3
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list