[PATCH 0/5] da8xx USB clocks

Sergei Shtylyov sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com
Wed Mar 16 05:36:54 PDT 2016


On 3/16/2016 1:35 AM, David Lechner wrote:

> I've implemented some proper clocks for the USB PHY clocks on da8xx. For those
> not familiar with the architecture, the SoC has one USB 1.1 OHCI port and one
> USB 2.O OTG port. The USB 1.1 PHY clock can optionally be supplied by the PLL
> in the USB 2.0 PHY.
>
> I have seen some comments in the past that these clock details don't belong in
> the USB drivers and I agree with that. So, I have moved the handling of the
> clocks out of the USB drivers to the mach code with the rest of the SoC clocks.
>
> This code has been tested on LEGO MINDSTORMS EV3 (AM1808/da850 family). Here is
> an output of the davinci clock debug to give you a better idea of how clocks
> are related.
>
>      root at ev3dev:~# cat /sys/kernel/debug/davinci_clocks
>      ref_clk           users=23      24000000 Hz
>        pll0            users=20 pll 300000000 Hz
>          pll0_aux_clk  users= 4 pll  24000000 Hz
>            ...
>            usb20_phy   users= 2      24000000 Hz
>              usb11_phy users= 1      24000000 Hz
>        ...
>      usb_ref_clk       users= 0      48000000 Hz
>
> usb20_phy and usb11_phy can optionally be children of usb_ref_clk instead.
>
>
> I'm planning on adding device tree bindings for the ohci driver, but I need to
> get some things sorted out with the regulator subsystem first. I see that Petr
> has been working on device tree support for the musb driver. This should take
> care of some of the concerns related to his changes too, for example, the
> ti,usb2-phy-refclock-hz device tree property is no longer needed because it
> is now taken care of in the clock code. I've actually included one of Petr's
> patchs here since one of my patches depends on it.
>
> I'm also working on device tree bindings for davinci clocks, but it will take
> me a while to get there. But that should not hold up the device tree bindings
> for da8xx ohci and musb.

    Nice to see that someone still cares about this code. With the ending of 
the MontaVista's efforts, it largely seemed like abandonware...

MBR, Sergei




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list