[PATCH] iommu: provide of_xlate pointer unconditionally
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Wed Mar 16 03:47:01 PDT 2016
On 15/03/16 21:37, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> iommu drivers that support the standard DT bindings use a of_xlate
> callback pointer, but that is only part of struct iommu_ops when
> CONFIG_OF_IOMMU is enabled, leading to build errors in randconfig
> builds when that is not provided:
>
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c:497:2: error: unknown field 'of_xlate' specified in initializer
> .of_xlate = mtk_iommu_of_xlate,
> ^
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c:497:14: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
> .of_xlate = mtk_iommu_of_xlate,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c:497:14: note: (near initialization for 'mtk_iommu_ops.domain_get_attr')
>
> We can work around it by adding more #ifdefs in each driver, but
> it seems nicer to just allow setting the pointer even if it is
> unused. This makes the driver code look nicer, and it gives better
> compile-time coverage when test building on other architectures.
Makes sense. I don't know what the exact plan is for ACPI IORT, but I
would imagine that that could also tie in to the same mechanism.
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> Fixes: 0df4fabe208d ("iommu/mediatek: Add mt8173 IOMMU driver")
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
FWIW the Exynos IOMMU driver has also been setting .of_xlate
unconditionally for a while, but that isn't covered by COMPILE_TEST.
> ---
> include/linux/iommu.h | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index a5c539fa5d2b..ef7a6ecd8584 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -195,9 +195,7 @@ struct iommu_ops {
> /* Get the number of windows per domain */
> u32 (*domain_get_windows)(struct iommu_domain *domain);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF_IOMMU
> int (*of_xlate)(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *args);
> -#endif
>
> unsigned long pgsize_bitmap;
> void *priv;
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list