[PATCH 0/8] EFI framebuffer support for ARM and arm64
Ard Biesheuvel
ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org
Thu Mar 10 08:23:22 PST 2016
(+ Laszlo)
On 10 March 2016 at 23:12, Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/09/2016 11:40 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>> This series adds support to ARM and arm64 for using the kernel's EFI
>> framebuffer driver to drive EFI Graphics Output Protocol (GOP) based
>> framebuffers.
>>
>> This involves refactoring some of the existing x86 code so it can be
>> reused
>> by ARM and arm64, and wiring it up both in the UEFI stub and in the core
>> kernel into the existing UEFI infrastructure for ARM and arm64.
>
>
> Given that I have access to a variety of different ARM64 UEFI
> implementations, how would I go about testing this code? Do I
> need a specific UEFI implementation and are there any special
> command line arguments I should pass to the kernel?
>
I have tested this myself on QEMU and FVP Base, which are both
software models. On bare metal, it would involve a system with a
graphics card that the firmware knows how to drive, and I am honestly
not sure if any such combinations currently exist, other than the ARM
development platforms such as Juno which have an embedded-style (i.e.,
non-PCI) graphics controller that the firmware knows how to drive out
of the box.
The code itself is smart enough to figure which (if any) of the
available handles carrying the GOP protocol is the one that is
attached to ConOut, and so there is nothing required to enable this
other than building it into the kernel and running it on a system with
a firmware supported screen attached.
--
Ard.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list