[PATCH 2/3] iommu/dma: Use correct offset in map_sg

Magnus Damm magnus.damm at gmail.com
Tue Mar 8 23:50:13 PST 2016


On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com> wrote:
> When mapping a non-page-aligned scatterlist entry, we copy the original
> offset to the output DMA address before aligning it to hand off to
> iommu_map_sg(), then later adding the IOVA page address portion to get
> the final mapped address. However, when the IOVA page size is smaller
> than the CPU page size, it is the offset within the IOVA page we want,
> not that within the CPU page, which can easily be larger than an IOVA
> page and thus result in an incorrect final address.
>
> Fix the bug by taking only the IOVA-aligned part of the offset as the
> basis of the DMA address, not the whole thing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> index 982e716..03811e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ int iommu_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
>                 size_t s_length = s->length;
>                 size_t pad_len = (mask - iova_len + 1) & mask;
>
> -               sg_dma_address(s) = s->offset;
> +               sg_dma_address(s) = s_offset;
>                 sg_dma_len(s) = s_length;
>                 s->offset -= s_offset;
>                 s_length = iova_align(iovad, s_length + s_offset);
> --
> 1.9.1

Hi Robin,

Thanks a lot for your fix! While I don't have any doubt that your
patch fixes a real issue I wonder if another update is needed.
Depending on what is expected perhaps just the comment above the code
wants an update or maybe the "un-swizzling" needs more work. With this
patch applied the code looks semi-complete to me at this point.

Currently the comment just above the hunk says:

    /*
     * Work out how much IOVA space we need, and align the segments to
     * IOVA granules for the IOMMU driver to handle. With some clever
     * trickery we can modify the list in-place, but reversibly, by
     * hiding the original data in the as-yet-unused DMA fields.
     */

With your fix the "original data" is no longer stored in the unused
DMA fields. Instead the s_offset value is stored as modified in
sg_dma_address() which in turn will make the iommu_dma_map_sg()
function return with modified sg->s_offset both on success and
failure.

Perhaps this is intentional design, or maybe __invalidate_sg() and
__finalize_sg() both need to support roll back? Any ideas?

Thanks,

/ magnus

My untested hack to support roll back on top of next-20160308 does
something like this...

--- 0001/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c
+++ work/drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c    2016-03-09 16:33:21.250513000 +0900
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ void iommu_dma_unmap_page(struct device
  * Handling IOVA concatenation can come later, if needed
  */
 static int __finalise_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg, int nents,
-        dma_addr_t dma_addr)
+             dma_addr_t dma_addr, struct iova_domain *iovad)
 {
     struct scatterlist *s;
     int i;
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static int __finalise_sg(struct device *

         s->offset = s_offset;
         s->length = s_length;
-        sg_dma_address(s) = dma_addr + s_offset;
+        sg_dma_address(s) = dma_addr + iova_offset(iovad, s_offset);
         dma_addr += s_dma_len;
     }
     return i;
@@ -455,11 +455,13 @@ int iommu_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev,
      * hiding the original data in the as-yet-unused DMA fields.
      */
     for_each_sg(sg, s, nents, i) {
-        size_t s_offset = iova_offset(iovad, s->offset);
+        size_t s_offset = s->offset;
         size_t s_length = s->length;

         sg_dma_address(s) = s_offset;
         sg_dma_len(s) = s_length;
+
+        s_offset = iova_offset(iovad, s_offset);
         s->offset -= s_offset;
         s_length = iova_align(iovad, s_length + s_offset);
         s->length = s_length;
@@ -494,7 +496,7 @@ int iommu_dma_map_sg(struct device *dev,
     if (iommu_map_sg(domain, dma_addr, sg, nents, prot) < iova_len)
         goto out_free_iova;

-    return __finalise_sg(dev, sg, nents, dma_addr);
+    return __finalise_sg(dev, sg, nents, dma_addr, iovad);

 out_free_iova:
     __free_iova(iovad, iova);



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list