[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ehci-platform: Add support for controllers with multiple reset lines
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Tue Mar 8 02:53:06 PST 2016
On 05-03-16 21:02, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:27:26AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 04-03-16 05:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 05:58:58PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> From: Reinder de Haan <patchesrdh at mveas.com>
>>>> At least the EHCI/OHCI found on the Allwinnner H3 SoC needs multiple
>>>> reset lines, the controller will not initialize while the reset for
>>>> its companion is still asserted, which means we need to de-assert
>>>> 2 resets for the controller to work.
>>>> Signed-off-by: Reinder de Haan <patchesrdh at mveas.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>>> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern at rowland.harvard.edu>
>>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org>
>>>> Changes in v2:
>>>> -Use the new reset_control_[de]assert_shared reset-controller functions
>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>> -Adjust for changes to shared-reset reset-controller functions
>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>> -Fix Ugly continuation line
>>> This breaks the build horribly :(
>>> As does patch 2/2, ugh.
>> As said in the cover letter:
>> "These patches apply on top of the related
>> reset-controller patches which have just been merged here:
>> git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git reset/next"
>> I guess I should have done s/apply on top of/depend on/
>> in the above bit. These patches apply fine without those
>> changes, but indeed they will not build.
> Then I can't take them, you know this :(
>> You may want to ask Philipp Zabel (added to the To: list)
>> to create a topic branch for this which you can merge into
>> your tree.
> If you all want me to do that, fine, otherwise just resend them after
> 4.6-rc1 is out and the build will not break at that time.
Ok I will resend these after 4.6-rc1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel