[PATCH 6/9] spi: imx: remove unnecessary bit clearing in mx51_ecspi_config

[Sascha Hauer]

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:06:57PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 04.03.2016 13:47, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:52:15PM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> Hi Sascha,
> >>
> >> On 24.02.2016 10:20, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >>> This reverts patch 1476253cef (spi: imx: fix ecspi mode setup)
> >>> The patch tried to fix something by clearing bits in the cfg variable,
> >>> but cfg is initialized to zero on function entry. There are no bits to
> >>> clear.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> >>
> >> I believe here the expected fix should be
> >>
> >> ----8<----
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> >> index 6a4ff27..9c9bae0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-imx.c
> >> @@ -316,9 +316,10 @@ static void __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_trigger(struct
> >> spi_imx_data *spi_imx)
> >>  static int __maybe_unused mx51_ecspi_config(struct spi_imx_data *spi_imx,
> >>  		struct spi_imx_config *config)
> >>  {
> >> -	u32 ctrl = MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_ENABLE, cfg = 0, dma = 0;
> >> +	u32 ctrl = MX51_ECSPI_CTRL_ENABLE, dma = 0;
> >>  	u32 tx_wml_cfg, rx_wml_cfg, rxt_wml_cfg;
> >>  	u32 clk = config->speed_hz, delay, reg;
> >> +	u32 cfg = readl(spi_imx->base + MX51_ECSPI_CONFIG);
> >>
> > 
> > With this change applied we would indeed have to clear and not only set the bits,
> > but why would we do this?
> 
> Locally we have quite a similar to 1476253cef change (well, correct version
> of it) authored by Knut Wohlrab, here is his comment from a discussion:
> 
> Please notice that iMX6 ECSPI controller support 4 channels/chip selects at
> one SPI bus. The original iMX driver implementation(*) did not care about
> the SPI_CPHA, SPI_CPOL and SPI_CS_HIGH configuration of the not selected
> channels and set this to "0". Depending on the configuration of this
> channels this could cause unwanted edges at the clock line when using this
> channels the next time. To prevent this, we introduce the read of the
> actual configuration/register content and set only the necessary changes.

If that's the reason to introduce this reason then we should commit a
patch that really fixes this behaviour and has the above reasoning in
the commit message. 1476253cef doesn't really change anything.
Is it really "could cause unwanted edeges" or "We have seen unwanted
edges"?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |