[PATCH v2 0/3] fix memremap on ARM
Ard Biesheuvel
ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org
Thu Mar 3 09:16:52 PST 2016
On 3 March 2016 at 18:13, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:24:41PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> If there are no remaining objections, may I suggest that Dan takes
>> patch #1 and #2, and that I put the third patch into Russell's patch
>> system? The only strict ordering requirement is that #1 is merged
>> before #2 and #3 both hit mainline, and that is solved by taking #1
>> and #2 in order.
>
> How does the dependency between 1 and 3 get satisfied? Your comment
> makes no sense to me.
>
Patch #3 introduces a function arch_memremap_wb() on the ARM side
which will never get called unless patch #2 is also merged. Once both
#2 and #3 are in, the memremap() call that #1 reverts will use
MT_MEMORY_RW attributes rather than MT_DEVICE_CACHED, so #1 needs to
go first, but #2 and #3 can go in in either order.
In other words, there are no build dependencies between the patches,
but to prevent pxa2xx-flash from using MT_MEMORY_RW attributes, it
needs to go in before #2
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list