[PATCH 0/3] KASAN: clean stale poison upon cold re-entry to kernel

Andrey Ryabinin aryabinin at virtuozzo.com
Thu Mar 3 06:53:32 PST 2016



On 03/03/2016 05:49 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 05:30:17PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> On 03/03/2016 03:38 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 01:02:27PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Rutland (3):
>>>>>   kasan: add functions to clear stack poison
>>>>>   sched/kasan: remove stale KASAN poison after hotplug
>>>>>   arm64: kasan: clear stale stack poison
>>>>>
>>>>>  arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S |  4 ++++
>>>>>  include/linux/kasan.h     |  6 +++++-
>>>>>  kernel/sched/core.c       |  3 +++
>>>>>  mm/kasan/kasan.c          | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> Looks good to me - via which tree would you like to see this merged upstream?
>>>
>>> I'd prefer the arm64 tree as arm64 is (the most) affected by the issue
>>> in practice.
>>>
>>> I'm happy for this to go via another tree if that's simpler; I'm not
>>> aware of anything that's likely to conflict in the arm64 tree.
>>>
>>> Catalin, Andrey, Andrew, any preference?
>>>
>>
>> I don't have any. arm64 tree is fine by me.
>>
>> For the patchset:
>>
>> 	Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin at virtuozzo.com>
>>
> 
> Cheers!
> 
> Following [1], I intend to change patch 1 to start at task_stack_page(t)
> rather than task_thread_info(task) + 1, to keep things simple.
> 
> I assume that your Reviewed-by would still apply in that case?
> 

Sure.

> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/2/428
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list