[PATCH v7 02/17] KVM: arm/arm64: check return value for kvm_register_vgic_device

Andre Przywara andre.przywara at arm.com
Thu Jun 30 09:19:59 PDT 2016


Hi,

On 29/06/16 16:59, Auger Eric wrote:
> 
> 
> On 28/06/2016 14:32, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> kvm_register_device_ops() can return an error, so lets check its return
> returned
>> value and propagate this up the call chain.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
>> ---
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 15 +++++++++------
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c         |  7 ++++++-
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c         | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h            |  2 +-
>>  4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
>> index 0130c4b..2f24f13 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
>> @@ -210,20 +210,24 @@ static void vgic_destroy(struct kvm_device *dev)
>>  	kfree(dev);
>>  }
>>  
>> -void kvm_register_vgic_device(unsigned long type)
>> +int kvm_register_vgic_device(unsigned long type)
>>  {
>> +	int ret = -ENODEV;
>> +
>>  	switch (type) {
>>  	case KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2:
>> -		kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v2_ops,
>> -					KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
>> +		ret = kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v2_ops,
>> +					      KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
>>  		break;
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC_V3
>>  	case KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3:
>> -		kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v3_ops,
>> -					KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3);
>> +		ret = kvm_register_device_ops(&kvm_arm_vgic_v3_ops,
>> +					      KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3);
>>  		break;
>>  #endif
>>  	}
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>>  /** vgic_attr_regs_access: allows user space to read/write VGIC registers
>> @@ -428,4 +432,3 @@ struct kvm_device_ops kvm_arm_vgic_v3_ops = {
>>  };
>>  
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC_V3 */
>> -
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
>> index e31405e..80313de 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v2.c
>> @@ -344,7 +344,12 @@ int vgic_v2_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info)
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	kvm_vgic_global_state.can_emulate_gicv2 = true;
>> -	kvm_register_vgic_device(KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
>> +	ret = kvm_register_vgic_device(KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		kvm_err("Cannot register GICv2 KVM device\n");
>> +		iounmap(kvm_vgic_global_state.vctrl_base);
> Aren't we supposed to tear down things done in create_hyp_io_mapping
> (such as pud_alloc_one)?

Mmh, seems you are right here. But tearing down the mapping looks a bit
involved. I wonder if we can do the registration before we do the mapping?

Cheers,
Andre

>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	kvm_vgic_global_state.vcpu_base = info->vcpu.start;
>>  	kvm_vgic_global_state.type = VGIC_V2;
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
>> index 346b4ad..e48a22e 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
>> @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ out:
>>  int vgic_v3_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info)
>>  {
>>  	u32 ich_vtr_el2 = kvm_call_hyp(__vgic_v3_get_ich_vtr_el2);
>> +	int ret;
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * The ListRegs field is 5 bits, but there is a architectural
>> @@ -319,12 +320,22 @@ int vgic_v3_probe(const struct gic_kvm_info *info)
>>  	} else {
>>  		kvm_vgic_global_state.vcpu_base = info->vcpu.start;
>>  		kvm_vgic_global_state.can_emulate_gicv2 = true;
>> -		kvm_register_vgic_device(KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
>> +		ret = kvm_register_vgic_device(KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			kvm_err("Cannot register GICv2 KVM device.\n");
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>>  		kvm_info("vgic-v2@%llx\n", info->vcpu.start);
>>  	}
>> +	ret = kvm_register_vgic_device(KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		kvm_err("Cannot register GICv3 KVM device.\n");
>> +		kvm_unregister_device_ops(KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	if (kvm_vgic_global_state.vcpu_base == 0)
>>  		kvm_info("disabling GICv2 emulation\n");
>> -	kvm_register_vgic_device(KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3);
>>  
>>  	kvm_vgic_global_state.vctrl_base = NULL;
>>  	kvm_vgic_global_state.type = VGIC_V3;
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> index 7b300ca..c752152 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
>> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static inline int vgic_register_redist_iodevs(struct kvm *kvm,
>>  }
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -void kvm_register_vgic_device(unsigned long type);
>> +int kvm_register_vgic_device(unsigned long type);
>>  int vgic_lazy_init(struct kvm *kvm);
>>  int vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm);
>>  
>>
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list