[linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name dt property
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Thu Jun 30 03:04:00 PDT 2016
Hi,
On 30-06-16 11:58, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 30-06-16 11:02, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Priit Laes <plaes at plaes.org> writes:
>>>
>>>>> What is the size of this nvram file? As it's board specific, I wonder
>>>>> if we can simply include it inside of the DT verbatim. I remember
>>>>> doing that (in the pre-dtb days, on real open firmware) for the
>>>>> "spidernet"
>>>>> ethernet driver.
>>>>
>>>> It contains a bit too much info:
>>>>
>>>> This is what CubieTruck requires:
>>>>
>>>> http://dl.cubieboard.org/public/Cubieboard/benn/firmware/ap6210/nvram_ap6210.txt
>>>
>>> In the nvram file I see lots of identifiers:
>>>
>>> manfid=0x2d0
>>> prodid=0x492
>>> vendid=0x14e4
>>> devid=0x4343
>>> boardtype=0x0598
>>> boardrev=0x1307
>>> boardnum=777
>>>
>>> Are any of these (or a combination of them) unique for each board type?
>>> What if one of these is provided through DT and then the driver could
>>> choose the nvram file based on the board id? Just another idea...
>>
>> That would require updating a table in the driver every time a new
>> board comes out, I do not believe that that is a good solution.
>
> You don't necessarily need to have a table in the driver if you embed
> the id to the filename, for example something like this:
>
> nvram-0598-1307.txt
> nvram-<boardtype>-<boardrev>.txt
Downside of this is, that as Arend already said, the nvram files are not
readily available.
Typically the boards we are talking about are shipped with android,
and the mainline kernel bringup is done by a user, not the manufacturer.
So the nvram file needs to be extracted from e.g. an android image,
having ap6210 in the filename allows the user to see that his module
(which is clearly labelled ap6210 is already supported, where as the
boardtype/boardrev magic numbers are a big unknown.
So I believe that using a human readable string is better here.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list