[PATCH V2 4/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct operator precedence

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:29 PM, Sinan Kaya <okaya at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 6/29/2016 9:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya at codeaurora.org>
>> Well, this is a rather obvious one, so I'm wondering why it is the
>> last one in the series?
>>
>
> The first three are more relevant to each other. It makes easy to
> correlate the changes.

But this one doesn't seem to depend on them and it could be applied
without them, right?

Thanks,
Rafael