[PATCH 16/21] usb: chipidea: msm: Restore wrapper settings after reset
Stephen Boyd
stephen.boyd at linaro.org
Wed Jun 29 12:13:45 PDT 2016
Quoting Peter Chen (2016-06-29 01:26:48)
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:28:33AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > When the RESET bit is set in the USBCMD register it resets quite
> > @@ -21,11 +23,22 @@
> > #define HS_PHY_SEC_CTRL 0x0278
> > # define HS_PHY_DIG_CLAMP_N BIT(16)
> >
> > +#define HS_PHY_GENCONFIG 0x009c
> > +# define HS_PHY_TXFIFO_IDLE_FORCE_DIS BIT(4)
> > +
> > +#define HS_PHY_GENCONFIG_2 0x00a0
> > +# define HS_PHY_SESS_VLD_CTRL_EN BIT(7)
> > +# define HS_PHY_ULPI_TX_PKT_EN_CLR_FIX BIT(19)
> > +
> > +#define HSPHY_SESS_VLD_CTRL BIT(25)
> > +
>
> Keep alignment please.
I take it this means it should look like:
#define HS_PHY_GENCONFIG
#define HS_PHY_TXFIFO_IDLE_FORCE_DIS
?
> > @@ -141,6 +172,13 @@ static int ci_hdrc_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (!base)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > + ci->vbus_edev = extcon_get_edev_by_phandle(&pdev->dev, 0);
> > + if (IS_ERR(ci->vbus_edev)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(ci->vbus_edev) != -ENODEV)
> > + return PTR_ERR(ci->vbus_edev);
> > + ci->vbus_edev = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
>
> Why not using ci->platdata->vbus_extcon directly?
Because ci->platdata->vbus_extcon is assigned after the child platform
driver probes, and we have no idea when that will happen from the
ci_hdrc_msm driver probe. If we try after ci_hdrc_add_device() we'll
race with the driver probe and only get the pointer sometimes.
>
> > reset_control_assert(reset);
> > usleep_range(10000, 12000);
> > reset_control_deassert(reset);
> > @@ -157,6 +195,14 @@ static int ci_hdrc_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > if (ret)
> > goto err_mux;
> >
> > + ulpi_node = of_find_node_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, "ulpi");
> > + if (ulpi_node) {
> > + phy_node = of_get_next_available_child(ulpi_node, NULL);
> > + ci->hsic = of_device_is_compatible(phy_node, "qcom,usb-hsic-phy");
> > + of_node_put(phy_node);
> > + }
> > + of_node_put(ulpi_node);
> > +
>
> Just confirm with you that ci->platdata->phy_mode is not enough?
Right. The phy_mode is never set to HSIC. It's always ULPI.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list