[RESEND PATCHv2 04/28] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: use new ti_clk_get API to search for clock handles
Tony Lindgren
tony at atomide.com
Wed Jun 29 00:01:50 PDT 2016
* Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com> [160628 23:19]:
> On 28/06/16 09:57, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com> [160613 12:07]:
> > > The new API avoids the need to add clock aliases for most of the clocks,
> > > should use of it is preferred. Many of the existing clock aliases are
> > > only created because of hwmod data.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 6 +++---
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> > > index 83cb527..0ea869c 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> > > @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static int _init_main_clk(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
> > > if (!oh->main_clk)
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > - oh->_clk = clk_get(NULL, oh->main_clk);
> > > + oh->_clk = ti_clk_get(oh->main_clk);
> > > if (IS_ERR(oh->_clk)) {
> > > pr_warn("omap_hwmod: %s: cannot clk_get main_clk %s\n",
> > > oh->name, oh->main_clk);
> >
> > After thinking about this for a while I think code outside TI specific
> > clock implementation should use just clk_get(). Otherwise we create more
> > dependencies to move code to live under drivers subdirectory.
> >
> > Can't we have clk_get() call a SoC specific helper function if clock
> > is not found?
>
> That is for Mike / Stephen to answer. Implementing something like this
> sounds trivial, I could just hook up the ti_clk_get being called here.
> However, any attempted changes to the clkdev implementation have been shot
> down so far, thus I did this.
Probably best to send a minimal patch for that for review. We want to
have the clock framework consumers using the standard interface.
> The problem is still the clocks which are just referred via a name only, not
> via a DT node.
OK
Regards,
Tony
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list