[PATCH v14 03/10] arm64: add conditional instruction simulation support

David Long dave.long at linaro.org
Sun Jun 26 20:06:46 PDT 2016


From: "David A. Long" <dave.long at linaro.org>

Cease using the arm32 arm_check_condition() function and replace it with
a local version for use in deprecated instruction support on arm64. Also
make the function table used by this available for future use by kprobes
and/or uprobes.

This function is derived from code written by Sandeepa Prabhu.

Signed-off-by: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.s.prabhu at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long at linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h        |  3 ++
 arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile           |  3 +-
 arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c | 19 ++++++-
 arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c             | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
index 497f7a2..a44abbd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
@@ -406,6 +406,9 @@ u32 aarch64_insn_extract_system_reg(u32 insn);
 u32 aarch32_insn_extract_reg_num(u32 insn, int offset);
 u32 aarch32_insn_mcr_extract_opc2(u32 insn);
 u32 aarch32_insn_mcr_extract_crm(u32 insn);
+
+typedef bool (pstate_check_t)(unsigned long);
+extern pstate_check_t * const aarch32_opcode_cond_checks[16];
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 #endif	/* __ASM_INSN_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
index 2173149..4653aca 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ $(obj)/%.stub.o: $(obj)/%.o FORCE
 	$(call if_changed,objcopy)
 
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT)		+= sys32.o kuser32.o signal32.o 	\
-					   sys_compat.o entry32.o		\
-					   ../../arm/kernel/opcodes.o
+					   sys_compat.o entry32.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER)	+= ftrace.o entry-ftrace.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)		+= arm64ksyms.o module.o
 arm64-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM64_MODULE_PLTS)	+= module-plts.o
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
index c37202c..2934894 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
@@ -366,6 +366,21 @@ static int emulate_swpX(unsigned int address, unsigned int *data,
 	return res;
 }
 
+#define	ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND	0xf
+
+static unsigned int __kprobes aarch32_check_condition(u32 opcode, u32 psr)
+{
+	u32 cc_bits  = opcode >> 28;
+
+	if (cc_bits != ARM_OPCODE_CONDITION_UNCOND) {
+		if ((*aarch32_opcode_cond_checks[cc_bits])(psr))
+			return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS;
+		else
+			return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL;
+	}
+	return ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_UNCOND;
+}
+
 /*
  * swp_handler logs the id of calling process, dissects the instruction, sanity
  * checks the memory location, calls emulate_swpX for the actual operation and
@@ -380,7 +395,7 @@ static int swp_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 instr)
 
 	type = instr & TYPE_SWPB;
 
-	switch (arm_check_condition(instr, regs->pstate)) {
+	switch (aarch32_check_condition(instr, regs->pstate)) {
 	case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS:
 		break;
 	case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL:
@@ -461,7 +476,7 @@ static int cp15barrier_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 instr)
 {
 	perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS, 1, regs, regs->pc);
 
-	switch (arm_check_condition(instr, regs->pstate)) {
+	switch (aarch32_check_condition(instr, regs->pstate)) {
 	case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_PASS:
 		break;
 	case ARM_OPCODE_CONDTEST_FAIL:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
index 28c6110f..5cb2f3d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/insn.c
@@ -1234,3 +1234,101 @@ u32 aarch32_insn_mcr_extract_crm(u32 insn)
 {
 	return insn & CRM_MASK;
 }
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_eq(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (pstate & PSR_Z_BIT) != 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_ne(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (pstate & PSR_Z_BIT) == 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_cs(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (pstate & PSR_C_BIT) != 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_cc(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (pstate & PSR_C_BIT) == 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_mi(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (pstate & PSR_N_BIT) != 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_pl(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (pstate & PSR_N_BIT) == 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_vs(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (pstate & PSR_V_BIT) != 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_vc(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return (pstate & PSR_V_BIT) == 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_hi(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);	/* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
+	return (pstate & PSR_C_BIT) != 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_ls(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	pstate &= ~(pstate >> 1);	/* PSR_C_BIT &= ~PSR_Z_BIT */
+	return (pstate & PSR_C_BIT) == 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_ge(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	pstate ^= (pstate << 3);	/* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
+	return (pstate & PSR_N_BIT) == 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_lt(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	pstate ^= (pstate << 3);	/* PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
+	return (pstate & PSR_N_BIT) != 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_gt(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	/*PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
+	unsigned long temp = pstate ^ (pstate << 3);
+
+	temp |= (pstate << 1);	/*PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
+	return (temp & PSR_N_BIT) == 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_le(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	/*PSR_N_BIT ^= PSR_V_BIT */
+	unsigned long temp = pstate ^ (pstate << 3);
+
+	temp |= (pstate << 1);	/*PSR_N_BIT |= PSR_Z_BIT */
+	return (temp & PSR_N_BIT) != 0;
+}
+
+static bool __kprobes __check_al(unsigned long pstate)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Note that the ARMv8 ARM calls condition code 0b1111 "nv", but states that
+ * it behaves identically to 0b1110 ("al").
+ */
+pstate_check_t * const aarch32_opcode_cond_checks[16] = {
+	__check_eq, __check_ne, __check_cs, __check_cc,
+	__check_mi, __check_pl, __check_vs, __check_vc,
+	__check_hi, __check_ls, __check_ge, __check_lt,
+	__check_gt, __check_le, __check_al, __check_al
+};
-- 
2.5.0




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list