[PATCH 08/12] doc: binding: pwrseq-usb-generic: add binding doc for generic usb power sequence driver
Peter Chen
hzpeterchen at gmail.com
Mon Jun 20 04:26:51 PDT 2016
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:16:48PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:09 AM, Peter Chen <peter.chen at nxp.com> wrote:
> > Add binding doc for generic usb power sequence driver, and update
> > generic usb device binding-doc accordingly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen at nxp.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq-usb-generic.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > .../devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.txt | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq-usb-generic.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq-usb-generic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq-usb-generic.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..8ad98382
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/pwrseq/pwrseq-usb-generic.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > +The power sequence for generic USB Devices
> > +
> > +Some hard-wired USB devices need to do power sequence to let the
> > +device work normally, the typical power sequence like: enable USB
> > +PHY clock, toggle reset pin, etc. But current Linux USB driver
> > +lacks of such code to do it, it may cause some hard-wired USB devices
> > +works abnormal or can't be recognized by controller at all. The
> > +power sequence will be done before this device can be found at USB
> > +bus.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible : contains "usb-pwrseq-generic".
>
> In case I have not been clear, no.
>
> I am not going to accept anything along the lines of the current mmc
> pwrseq. I am basically okay with Krzysztof's proposal as it is *only*
> an added property and not a duplication of information. I'd suggest
> you figure out how to make the kernel work with that rather than
> trying to work-around whatever kernel limitations there are.
>
I see.
Would you agree with below:
&usbotg1 {
vbus-supply = <®_usb_otg1_vbus>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usb_otg1_id>;
status = "okay";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
hub: genesys at 1 {
compatible = "usb5e3,608";
reg = <1>;
power-sequence;
reset-gpios = <&gpio4 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* hub reset pin */
reset-duration-us = <10>;
clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_CKO>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
ethernet: asix at 1 {
compatible = "usbb95,1708";
reg = <1>;
power-sequence;
reset-gpios = <&gpio4 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; /* ethernet_rst */
reset-duration-us = <15>;
clocks = <&clks IMX6SX_CLK_IPG>;
};
};
};
If the node has property "power-sequence", the pwrseq core will create
related platform device, and the driver under pwrseq driver will handle
power sequence stuffs. The property below "power-sequence" will be
handled at pwrseq driver.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list