[PATCH v7 15/15] acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64

[Hanjun Guo]

On 2016/6/10 3:47, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 25/05/16 00:35, David Daney wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
>>
>> Add function needed for cpu to node mapping, and enable ACPI based
>> NUMA for ARM64 in Kconfig
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter at cavium.com>
>> [david.daney at cavium.com added ACPI_NUMA default to y for ARM64]
>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney at cavium.com>
>> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/Kconfig |  4 ++--
>>   drivers/acpi/numa.c  | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   include/linux/acpi.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>>   3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> index b7e2e77..dd76b36 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> @@ -291,8 +291,8 @@ config ACPI_THERMAL
>>   config ACPI_NUMA
>>       bool "NUMA support"
>>       depends on NUMA
>> -    depends on (X86 || IA64)
>> -    default y if IA64_GENERIC || IA64_SGI_SN2
>> +    depends on (X86 || IA64 || ARM64)
>> +    default y if IA64_GENERIC || IA64_SGI_SN2 || ARM64
>>
>>   config ACPI_CUSTOM_DSDT_FILE
>>       string "Custom DSDT Table file to include"
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> index fad6d28..9b7ce40 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> @@ -170,6 +170,18 @@ acpi_table_print_srat_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
>>           }
>>           break;
>>
>> +    case ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY:
>> +        {
>> +            struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *p =
>> +                (struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *)header;
>> +            pr_debug("SRAT Processor (acpi id[0x%04x]) in proximity domain %d %s\n",
>> +                 p->acpi_processor_uid,
>> +                 p->proximity_domain,
>> +                 (p->flags & ACPI_SRAT_GICC_ENABLED) ?
>> +                 "enabled" : "disabled");
>> +        }
>> +        break;
>> +
>>       default:
>>           pr_warn("Found unsupported SRAT entry (type = 0x%x)\n",
>>               header->type);
>> @@ -360,6 +372,24 @@ acpi_parse_processor_affinity(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static int __init
>> +acpi_parse_gicc_affinity(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
>> +             const unsigned long end)
>> +{
>> +    struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *processor_affinity;
>> +
>> +    processor_affinity = (struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *)header;
>> +    if (!processor_affinity)
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    acpi_table_print_srat_entry(header);
>> +
>> +    /* let architecture-dependent part to do it */
>> +    acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(processor_affinity);
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int __initdata parsed_numa_memblks;
>>
>>   static int __init
>> @@ -404,6 +434,9 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
>>   {
>>       int cnt = 0;
>>
>> +    if (acpi_disabled)
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>>       /*
>>        * Should not limit number with cpu num that is from NR_CPUS or nr_cpus=
>>        * SRAT cpu entries could have different order with that in MADT.
>> @@ -412,13 +445,15 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
>>
>>       /* SRAT: Static Resource Affinity Table */
>>       if (!acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, acpi_parse_srat)) {
>> -        struct acpi_subtable_proc srat_proc[2];
>> +        struct acpi_subtable_proc srat_proc[3];
>>
>>           memset(srat_proc, 0, sizeof(srat_proc));
>>           srat_proc[0].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY;
>>           srat_proc[0].handler = acpi_parse_processor_affinity;
>>           srat_proc[1].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_X2APIC_CPU_AFFINITY;
>>           srat_proc[1].handler = acpi_parse_x2apic_affinity;
>> +        srat_proc[1].id = ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY;
>> +        srat_proc[1].handler = acpi_parse_gicc_affinity;
>
> Should be srat_proc[2].id and srat_proc[2].handler, right?

Good catch, will send a updated version shortly.

Thanks
Hanjun