[PATCH v3 1/2] clocksource: Add Oxford Semiconductor RPS Dual Timer

[Neil Armstrong]

On 06/16/2016 03:33 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 05:35 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on tip/timers/core]
>> [also build test WARNING on v4.7-rc3 next-20160615]
>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Neil-Armstrong/clocksource-Add-support-for-Oxford-Semiconductor-RPS-Dual-Timer/20160615-181650
>> config: blackfin-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: bfin-uclinux-gcc (GCC) 4.6.3
>> reproduce:
>>          wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>          make.cross ARCH=blackfin
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>>> drivers/clocksource/timer-oxnas-rps.c:50:0: warning: "TIMER_ENABLE" redefined [enabled by default]
>>     arch/blackfin/mach-bf533/include/mach/defBF532.h:97:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
>>
>> vim +/TIMER_ENABLE +50 drivers/clocksource/timer-oxnas-rps.c
>>
>>      34    /* TIMER1 used as tick
>>      35     * TIMER2 used as clocksource
>>      36     */
>>      37   
>>      38    /* Registers definitions */
>>      39   
>>      40    #define TIMER_LOAD_REG        0x0
>>      41    #define TIMER_CURR_REG        0x4
>>      42    #define TIMER_CTRL_REG        0x8
>>      43    #define TIMER_CLRINT_REG    0xC
>>      44   
>>      45    #define TIMER_BITS        24
>>      46   
>>      47    #define TIMER_MAX_VAL        (BIT(TIMER_BITS) - 1)
>>      48   
>>      49    #define TIMER_PERIODIC        BIT(6)
>>    > 50    #define TIMER_ENABLE        BIT(7)
> 
> It is already defined in the arch/blackfin/include dir.
> 

Hi Daniel,

This should never happen due to the blackfin headers.
Actually the COMPILE_TEST option made these two happen.

Should I push a v4 to keep COMPILE_TEST ?

Neil