[GIT PULL 4/8] ARM: exynos: Topic branch with driver changes for v4.8

[Sylwester Nawrocki]

On 06/16/2016 02:16 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/13/2016 11:47 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:25:29PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> A topic branch for MultiFormat Codec driver. This pulls in
>>> >> an external dependency from media tree (Sylwester Nawrocki).
>>> >>
>>> >> Below you will find two pull-request-changelogs
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Best regards,
>>> >> Krzysztof
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ################################################################
>>> >> Samsung tree only changes:
>>> >> ################################################################
>>> >>
>>> >> The following changes since commit 04f776734c4e03e33111d3d5a994b589870df623:
>>> >>
>>> >>   media: s5p-mfc: add iommu support (2016-06-03 11:13:45 +0200)
>>> >>
>>> >> are available in the git repository at:
>>> >>
>>> >>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-drivers-exynos-mfc-4.8
>>> >>
>>> >> for you to fetch changes up to 96167bd37dd604cbba0aed341765dda8556405b2:
>>> >>
>>> >>   ARM: dts: exynos: Enable MFC device on Exynos4412 Odroid boards (2016-06-06 09:30:43 +0200)
>>> >>
>>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> Topic branch for Exynos MFC changes for v4.8:
>>> >> Pull s5p-mfc changes from media tree so the arm/mach-exynos code
>>> >> could be removed. The bindings are converted to generic reserved memory
>>> >> bindings.
>> > 
>> > Hi,
>> > 
>> > Tis branch contains an external dependency but I don't see the toplevel
>> > maintainer cc:d on the pull request. Just to avoid any confusion, I'd like to
>> > double check and make sure this branch is expected to be stable.
>> > 
>> > Mauro, is that the case? The branch is:
>> > Merge branch 'for-v4.8/media/exynos-mfc' of git://linuxtv.org/snawrocki/samsung into for-v4.8/exynos-mfc
>> > 
>> > I see it in -next, so I just want to make sure it's on a stable branch that
>> > won't be rewritten. 
>
> Good question. Mauro, could you confirm?

The above branch is stable and won't be changed, it's already merged
to the media tree.

-- 
Thanks,
Sylwester