[PATCH v2] arm64: allow building with kcov coverage on ARM64

[Alexander Potapenko]

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:25:10AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:16:08PM +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote:
>> > > I built and booted (via EFI) a kernel with this feature enabled (also
>> > > with the boot/Makefile change removed). I haven't tested the feature
>> > > itself as such, as I'm not sure how to do that.
>> > You can test it by running the test program from Documentation/kcov.txt.
>>
>> Ah, I hadn't spotted that. If I get the chance I'll try to give that a
>> go.
>
> I just had a go (with this applied atop of v4.7-rc3), and I get:
>
> root at ribbensteg:/home/nanook# ./kcov
> mmap: No such device
>
> The device exists (it was able to open the fd, evidently):
>
> root at ribbensteg:/home/nanook# ls -al /sys/kernel/debug/kcov
> -rw------- 1 root root 0 Jan  1  1970 /sys/kernel/debug/kcov
>
> Strace show me:
>
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/kernel/debug/kcov", O_RDWR) = 3
> ioctl(3, CHIOMOVE or CM_IOCGATR, 0x10000) = 0
> mmap(NULL, 524288, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, 3, 0) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
>
> It doesn't look like the error paths in kcov_mmap are hitting.
>
> Any ideas?
According to Dmitry (thanks, Dmitry!) this has regressed recently, but
there's a pending patch that should probably fix the problem:
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1605.2/04379.html
> Thanks,
> Mark.


-- 
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München

Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman, Paul Terence Manicle
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg