On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:35:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > i2c9 = "i2cexio1"; > > i2c10 = "i2chdmi"; > > i2c11 = "gpioi2c"; > > + i2c12 = "i2cpwr"; > > To make it easier for users, we should maybe group them? > > i2c8+9: additional gpio busses > i2c10-13: i2cexioX Should we also group gpioi2cX?