[PATCH 01/48] clk: at91: replace usleep() by udelay() calls
Boris Brezillon
boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com
Tue Jun 14 09:18:20 PDT 2016
On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 21:35:17 +0530
Afzal Mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 05:24:09PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 11/06/2016 at 00:30:36 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>
> > > Does this have to be called that early? It seems wasteful to always
> > > call udelay() here, when these are functions that are normally
> > > allowed to sleep.
>
> > So I've tested it and something like that would work:
> >
> > if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> > udelay(osc->startup_usec);
> > else
> > usleep_range(osc->startup_usec, osc->startup_usec + 1);
> >
> > But I'm afraid it would be the first driver to actually do something
> > like that (however, it is already the only driver trying to sleep).
>
> tglx has suggested to modify clock core to handle a somewhat similar
> kind of scenario (probably should work here too) and avoid driver
> changes,
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1606061448010.28031@nanos
Oh, interesting. Definitely a better solution than this custom check.
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list