[PATCH v3 03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle approximation
Boris Brezillon
boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com
Tue Jun 14 02:13:11 PDT 2016
The current implementation always round down the duty and period
values, while it would be better to round them to the closest integer.
These changes are needed in preparation of atomic update support to
prevent a period/duty cycle drift when executing several time the
'pwm_get_state() / modify / pwm_apply_state()' sequence.
Say you have an expected period of 3.333 us and a clk rate of
112.666667 MHz -- the clock frequency doesn't divide evenly,
so the period (stashed in nanoseconds) shrinks when we convert to
the register value and back, as follows:
pwm_apply_state(): register = period * 112666667 / 1000000000;
pwm_get_state(): period = register * 1000000000 / 112666667;
or in other words:
period = period * 112666667 / 1000000000 * 1000000000 / 112666667;
which yields a sequence like:
3333 -> 3328
3328 -> 3319
3319 -> 3310
3310 -> 3301
3301 -> 3292
3292 -> ... (etc) ...
With this patch, we'd see instead:
period = div_round_closest(period * 112666667, 1000000000) *
1000000000 / 112666667;
which yields a stable sequence:
3333 -> 3337
3337 -> 3337
3337 -> ... (etc) ...
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris at chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris at chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
index 7d9cc90..68d72ce 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
@@ -114,12 +114,11 @@ static int rockchip_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
* default prescaler value for all practical clock rate values.
*/
div = clk_rate * period_ns;
- do_div(div, pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC);
- period = div;
+ period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div,
+ pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC);
div = clk_rate * duty_ns;
- do_div(div, pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC);
- duty = div;
+ duty = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(div, pc->data->prescaler * NSEC_PER_SEC);
ret = clk_enable(pc->clk);
if (ret)
--
2.7.4
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list