[PATCH v2 0/4] clocksource: rockchip/timer: Support rktimer for rk3399

[Caesar Wang]

On 2016年06月14日 12:00, Huang, Tao wrote:
> Hi Daniel:
> On 2016年06月13日 21:06, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:54:29PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>> This series patches had been tested on rockchip inside kernel.
>>> In order to support the rk3399 SoC timer and turn off interrupts and IPIs to
>>> save power in idle.
>> For my personnal information, are the arch_timer in the same power domain
>> than the CPU ? IOW, what is the 'always-on' property in the DT ?
> Yes. In our SoC design, all arch (generic) timer in the same power
> domain of CPU core. So if one CPU core power down, the arch (generic)
> timer will lose it's state and stop working.
> While rk timer maybe in peri power domain or pmu power domain, so the
> timer will still work when CPU power down.
>
> But before RK3399, all SoCs with CPU power domain, do not support auto
> power down while cpu idle. So the arch timer can be seem as always on,
> i.e. we don't need a broadcast timer at all.
>
>>> Okay, it still works bootup on rk3288/other SoCs, even though many socs
>>> hasn't used
>>> the broadcast timer.
>> Yes, unfortunately the SoC design on rk3288 and the previous ones do not
>> allow to use a cpuidle driver with cpu/cluster power down, so obviously the
>> broadcast timer is pointless on these boards :)
>>
> You are right.
>
>>> History version:
>>> v1:
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/25/186
>>>
>>> Easy to test for my borad.
>>> localhost / # cat /proc/interrupts
>>> CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       CPU4       CPU5
>>> 1:          0          0          0          0          0          0     GICv3  29 Edge      arch_timer
>>> ...
>>> 5:          0          0          0          0          0          0     GICv3 113 Level     rk_timer
>>> ..
>>>
>>> localhost / # cat /proc/timer_list | grep event_handler
>>> get "event_handler:  hrtimer_interrupt"
>>> event_handler:  tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast
>>> event_handler:  hrtimer_interrupt
>> What are you trying to demonstrate here ? There are no interrupts for both
>> arch_timer and rk_timer.

My god!! let's forget it now!
Sorry for forgetting what happened.
---

Re-picked them up for my board since I'm doing other things to run a 
single cpu.

localhost / # cat /proc/interrupts
            CPU0
   1:          0     GICv3  29 Edge      arch_timer
   2:        807     GICv3  30 Edge      arch_timer
   5:        712     GICv3 113 Level     rk_timer
....


> I don't know. Maybe Caesar do something wrong :(
> This is my output:
>             CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       CPU4       CPU5
>
> ...
>    2:       2911       1967       1588       1608       1295       1606
>     GICv3  30 Edge      arch_timer
>    5:        578        637        684        626        161        165
>     GICv3 113 Level     rk_timer
>
>
>

-- 
caesar wang | software engineer | wxt at rock-chip.com