Support for unaligned watchpoints in arm/arm64
Pratyush Anand
panand at redhat.com
Mon Jun 6 23:55:20 PDT 2016
On 31/05/2016:01:38:27 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 05:04:46PM +0100, Pavel Labath wrote:
> > Hello all,
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> > I've been wondering if there are any plans about adding support for
> > unaligned watchpoints to the kernel. It seems quite a shame that
> > applications are not able not use them, even though the hardware
> > should support that feature.
>
> I'm actually coming round to the idea of ditching the perf hw_breakpoint
> mechanism entirely and simply writing a ptrace back-end that can expose
> the hardware features directly to userspace. The two issues with this
> are:
>
> (1) It's a fair amount of work
So, by the time this new interface would come, probably we can consider a fixup
like following to resolve this issue at hand. Probably, things should work by
just allowing hw_breakpoint.c to pass checks for unaligned offset when it is a
WATCHPOINT, no?
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 26a6bf77d272..c803347c1413 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -384,7 +384,12 @@ int arch_bp_generic_fields(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl,
*gen_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
@@ -384,7 +384,12 @@ int arch_bp_generic_fields(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl,
*gen_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
break;
default:
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (ctrl.type == ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE
+ || ctrl.len & (ctrl.len + 1)
+ || ctrl.len < ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1
+ || ctrl.len > ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ *gen_len = ffs(ctrl.len + 1) - 1;
}
return 0;
@@ -430,7 +435,11 @@ static int arch_build_bp_info(struct perf_event *bp)
info->ctrl.len = ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8;
break;
default:
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (info->ctrl.type == ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE
+ || bp->attr.bp_len < HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1
+ || bp->attr.bp_len > HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ info->ctrl.len = (1 << bp->attr.bp_len) - 1;
}
/*
@Pavel, does above patch helps to resolve the issue.
~Pratyush
> (2) We might already have users of the perf interface (including compat)
>
> I'm really not happy with the way hw_breakpoint worked out :(
>
> Will
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list