[PATCH v8 2/3] CMDQ: Mediatek CMDQ driver
Horng-Shyang Liao
hs.liao at mediatek.com
Fri Jun 3 05:13:57 PDT 2016
Hi Matthias,
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 13:18 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 03/06/16 08:12, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> > Hi Mathias,
> >
> > Please see my inline reply.
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 10:46 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >> On 01/06/16 11:57, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> >>> Hi Mathias,
> >>>
> >>> Please see my inline reply.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 22:04 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 31/05/16 10:36, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Mathias,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please see my inline reply.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 17:31 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 30/05/16 05:19, HS Liao wrote:
> >>>>>>> This patch is first version of Mediatek Command Queue(CMDQ) driver. The
> >>>>>>> CMDQ is used to help read/write registers with critical time limitation,
> >>>>>>> such as updating display configuration during the vblank. It controls
> >>>>>>> Global Command Engine (GCE) hardware to achieve this requirement.
> >>>>>>> Currently, CMDQ only supports display related hardwares, but we expect
> >>>>>>> it can be extended to other hardwares for future requirements.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: HS Liao <hs.liao at mediatek.com>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu at mediatek.com>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig | 10 +
> >>>>>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile | 1 +
> >>>>>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.c | 943 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>> include/soc/mediatek/cmdq.h | 197 +++++++++
> >>>>>>> 4 files changed, 1151 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.c
> >>>>>>> create mode 100644 include/soc/mediatek/cmdq.h
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> >>>>>>> index 0a4ea80..c4ad75c 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> >>>>>>> @@ -1,6 +1,16 @@
> >>>>>>> #
> >>>>>>> # MediaTek SoC drivers
> >>>>>>> #
> >>>>>>> +config MTK_CMDQ
> >>>>>>> + bool "MediaTek CMDQ Support"
> >>>>>>> + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
> >>>>
> >>>> depends on ARM64 ?
> >>>
> >>> Will add ARM64.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> + select MTK_INFRACFG
> >>>>>>> + help
> >>>>>>> + Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek Command Queue (CMDQ)
> >>>>>>> + driver. The CMDQ is used to help read/write registers with critical
> >>>>>>> + time limitation, such as updating display configuration during the
> >>>>>>> + vblank.
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> config MTK_INFRACFG
> >>>>>>> bool "MediaTek INFRACFG Support"
> >>>>>>> depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> >>>>>>> index 12998b0..f7397ef 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> >>>>>>> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> >>>>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ) += mtk-cmdq.o
> >>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_INFRACFG) += mtk-infracfg.o
> >>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP) += mtk-pmic-wrap.o
> >>>>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_SCPSYS) += mtk-scpsys.o
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.c
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 0000000..e9d6e1c
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.c
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,943 @@
> >>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2015 MediaTek Inc.
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >>>>>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> >>>>>>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> >>>>>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> >>>>>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> >>>>>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <soc/mediatek/cmdq.h>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_INITIAL_CMD_BLOCK_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_INST_SIZE 8 /* instruction is 64-bit */
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_IRQ_MASK 0xffff
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_DRIVER_DEVICE_NAME "mtk_cmdq"
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_CLK_NAME "gce"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We can put the names in directly to un-bloat the defines.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I will use the names directly and remove defines.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_CURR_IRQ_STATUS 0x010
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_CURR_LOADED_THR 0x018
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_SLOT_CYCLES 0x030
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_BASE 0x100
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_SHIFT 0x080
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Wouldn't be CMDQ_THR_SIZE more accurate?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will rename it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_WARM_RESET 0x00
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_ENABLE_TASK 0x04
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_SUSPEND_TASK 0x08
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_CURR_STATUS 0x0c
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_IRQ_STATUS 0x10
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_IRQ_ENABLE 0x14
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR 0x20
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR 0x24
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_CFG 0x40
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_ENABLED 0x1
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_DISABLED 0x0
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_SUSPEND 0x1
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_RESUME 0x0
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_STATUS_SUSPENDED BIT(1)
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_DO_WARM_RESET BIT(0)
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_ACTIVE_SLOT_CYCLES 0x3200
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_PRIORITY 3
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_IRQ_DONE 0x1
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_IRQ_ERROR 0x12
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_IRQ_EN 0x13 /* done + error */
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> #define CMDQ_THR_IRQ_EN (CMDQ_THR_IRQ_ERROR | CMDQ_THR_IRQ_DONE)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will do.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_IRQ_MASK 0x13
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> never used.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will remove.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_THR_EXECUTING BIT(31)
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_ARG_A_WRITE_MASK 0xffff
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_SUBSYS_MASK 0x1f
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_OP_CODE_MASK 0xff000000
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_OP_CODE_SHIFT 24
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Couldn't we connect the mask with the shift, or aren't they related?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> #define CMDQ_OP_CODE_MASK (0xff << CMDQ_OP_CODE_SHIFT)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will do.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_SUBSYS_SHIFT 16
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_WRITE_ENABLE_MASK BIT(0)
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_JUMP_BY_OFFSET 0x10000000
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_JUMP_BY_PA 0x10000001
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_JUMP_PASS CMDQ_INST_SIZE
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_WFE_UPDATE BIT(31)
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_WFE_WAIT BIT(15)
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_WFE_WAIT_VALUE 0x1
> >>>>>>> +#define CMDQ_EOC_IRQ_EN BIT(0)
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +enum cmdq_thread_index {
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_DISP_MAIN_IDX, /* main */
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_DISP_SUB_IDX, /* sub */
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_DISP_MISC_IDX, /* misc */
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_MAX_COUNT, /* max */
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>> + * CMDQ_CODE_MOVE:
> >>>>>>> + * move value into internal register as mask
> >>>>>>> + * format: op mask
> >>>>>>> + * CMDQ_CODE_WRITE:
> >>>>>>> + * write value into target register
> >>>>>>> + * format: op subsys address value
> >>>>>>> + * CMDQ_CODE_JUMP:
> >>>>>>> + * jump by offset
> >>>>>>> + * format: op offset
> >>>>>>> + * CMDQ_CODE_WFE:
> >>>>>>> + * wait for event and clear
> >>>>>>> + * it is just clear if no wait
> >>>>>>> + * format: [wait] op event update:1 to_wait:1 wait:1
> >>>>>>> + * [clear] op event update:1 to_wait:0 wait:0
> >>>>>>> + * CMDQ_CODE_EOC:
> >>>>>>> + * end of command
> >>>>>>> + * format: op irq_flag
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think we need more documentation of how this command queue engine is
> >>>>>> working. If not, I think it will be really complicated to understand how
> >>>>>> to use this.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +enum cmdq_code {
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_CODE_MOVE = 0x02,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_CODE_WRITE = 0x04,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_CODE_JUMP = 0x10,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_CODE_WFE = 0x20,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_CODE_EOC = 0x40,
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +enum cmdq_task_state {
> >>>>>>> + TASK_STATE_BUSY, /* running on a GCE thread */
> >>>>>>> + TASK_STATE_ERROR,
> >>>>>>> + TASK_STATE_DONE,
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_task_cb {
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_async_flush_cb cb;
> >>>>>>> + void *data;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_thread {
> >>>>>>> + void __iomem *base;
> >>>>>>> + struct list_head task_busy_list;
> >>>>>>> + wait_queue_head_t wait_task_done;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_task {
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq;
> >>>>>>> + struct list_head list_entry;
> >>>>>>> + enum cmdq_task_state task_state;
> >>>>>>> + void *va_base;
> >>>>>>> + dma_addr_t pa_base;
> >>>>>>> + u64 engine_flag;
> >>>>>>> + size_t command_size;
> >>>>>>> + u32 num_cmd;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> num_cmd is directly connected to command_size. I prefer to just keep
> >>>>>> num_cmd and calculate the command_size where necessary.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> After I trace code, I prefer to keep command_size and calculate num_cmd
> >>>>> where necessary. What do you think?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I suppose you prefer this, as you are writing to the GCE depending on
> >>>> the command_size. I think it is worth to create a macro for the
> >>>> calculation of the number of commands, to make the code more readable.
> >>>> Would be nice if you would just pass cmdq_task to it and it would return
> >>>> the number. Just as an idea.
> >>>
> >>> Will add macro.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_thread *thread;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task_cb cb;
> >>>>>>> + struct work_struct release_work;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq {
> >>>>>>> + struct device *dev;
> >>>>>>> + void __iomem *base;
> >>>>>>> + u32 irq;
> >>>>>>> + struct workqueue_struct *task_release_wq;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_thread thread[CMDQ_THR_MAX_COUNT];
> >>>>>>> + struct mutex task_mutex; /* for task */
> >>>>>>> + spinlock_t exec_lock; /* for exec */
> >>>>>>> + struct clk *clock;
> >>>>>>> + bool suspended;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_subsys {
> >>>>>>> + u32 base;
> >>>>>>> + int id;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static const struct cmdq_subsys gce_subsys[] = {
> >>>>>>> + {0x1400, 1},
> >>>>>>> + {0x1401, 2},
> >>>>>>> + {0x1402, 3},
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_subsys_base_to_id(u32 base)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + int i;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(gce_subsys); i++)
> >>>>>>> + if (gce_subsys[i].base == base)
> >>>>>>> + return gce_subsys[i].id;
> >>>>>>> + return -EFAULT;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_eng_get_thread(u64 flag)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + if (flag & BIT_ULL(CMDQ_ENG_DISP_DSI0))
> >>>>>>> + return CMDQ_THR_DISP_MAIN_IDX;
> >>>>>>> + else if (flag & BIT_ULL(CMDQ_ENG_DISP_DPI0))
> >>>>>>> + return CMDQ_THR_DISP_SUB_IDX;
> >>>>>>> + else
> >>>>>>> + return CMDQ_THR_DISP_MISC_IDX;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_task_release(struct cmdq_task *task)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = task->cmdq;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + dma_free_coherent(cmdq->dev, task->command_size, task->va_base,
> >>>>>>> + task->pa_base);
> >>>>>>> + kfree(task);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static struct cmdq_task *cmdq_task_acquire(struct cmdq_rec *rec,
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task_cb cb)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = rec->cmdq;
> >>>>>>> + struct device *dev = cmdq->dev;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task *task;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + task = kzalloc(sizeof(*task), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&task->list_entry);
> >>>>>>> + task->va_base = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, rec->command_size,
> >>>>>>> + &task->pa_base, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> + if (!task->va_base) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "allocate command buffer failed\n");
> >>>>>>> + kfree(task);
> >>>>>>> + return NULL;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + task->cmdq = cmdq;
> >>>>>>> + task->command_size = rec->command_size;
> >>>>>>> + task->engine_flag = rec->engine_flag;
> >>>>>>> + task->task_state = TASK_STATE_BUSY;
> >>>>>>> + task->cb = cb;
> >>>>>>> + memcpy(task->va_base, rec->buf, rec->command_size);
> >>>>>>> + task->num_cmd = task->command_size / CMDQ_INST_SIZE;
> >>>>>>> + return task;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_thread_writel(struct cmdq_thread *thread, u32 value,
> >>>>>>> + u32 offset)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + writel(value, thread->base + offset);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static u32 cmdq_thread_readl(struct cmdq_thread *thread, u32 offset)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + return readl(thread->base + offset);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We can get rid of cmdq_thread_readl/writel.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will do.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_thread_suspend(struct cmdq *cmdq, struct cmdq_thread *thread)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + u32 status;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, CMDQ_THR_SUSPEND, CMDQ_THR_SUSPEND_TASK);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* If already disabled, treat as suspended successful. */
> >>>>>>> + if (!(cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_ENABLE_TASK) &
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_ENABLED))
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (readl_poll_timeout_atomic(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_CURR_STATUS,
> >>>>>>> + status, status & CMDQ_THR_STATUS_SUSPENDED, 0, 10)) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(cmdq->dev, "suspend GCE thread 0x%x failed\n",
> >>>>>>> + (u32)(thread->base - cmdq->base));
> >>>>>>> + return -EFAULT;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_thread_resume(struct cmdq_thread *thread)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, CMDQ_THR_RESUME, CMDQ_THR_SUSPEND_TASK);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_thread_reset(struct cmdq *cmdq, struct cmdq_thread *thread)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + u32 warm_reset;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, CMDQ_THR_DO_WARM_RESET, CMDQ_THR_WARM_RESET);
> >>>>>>> + if (readl_poll_timeout_atomic(thread->base + CMDQ_THR_WARM_RESET,
> >>>>>>> + warm_reset, !(warm_reset & CMDQ_THR_DO_WARM_RESET),
> >>>>>>> + 0, 10)) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(cmdq->dev, "reset GCE thread 0x%x failed\n",
> >>>>>>> + (u32)(thread->base - cmdq->base));
> >>>>>>> + return -EFAULT;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + writel(CMDQ_THR_ACTIVE_SLOT_CYCLES, cmdq->base + CMDQ_THR_SLOT_CYCLES);
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_thread_disable(struct cmdq *cmdq, struct cmdq_thread *thread)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_reset(cmdq, thread);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, CMDQ_THR_DISABLED, CMDQ_THR_ENABLE_TASK);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/* notify GCE to re-fetch commands by setting GCE thread PC */
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_thread_invalidate_fetched_data(struct cmdq_thread *thread)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread,
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR),
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(struct cmdq_task *task)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_thread *thread = task->thread;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task *prev_task = list_last_entry(
> >>>>>>> + &thread->task_busy_list, typeof(*task), list_entry);
> >>>>>>> + u64 *prev_task_base = prev_task->va_base;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* let previous task jump to this task */
> >>>>>>> + prev_task_base[prev_task->num_cmd - 1] = (u64)CMDQ_JUMP_BY_PA << 32 |
> >>>>>>> + task->pa_base;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_invalidate_fetched_data(thread);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/* we assume tasks in the same display GCE thread are waiting the same event. */
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_task_remove_wfe(struct cmdq_task *task)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + u32 wfe_option = CMDQ_WFE_UPDATE | CMDQ_WFE_WAIT | CMDQ_WFE_WAIT_VALUE;
> >>>>>>> + u32 wfe_op = CMDQ_CODE_WFE << CMDQ_OP_CODE_SHIFT;
> >>>>>>> + u32 *base = task->va_base;
> >>>>>>> + u32 num_cmd = task->num_cmd << 1;
> >>>>>>> + int i;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_cmd; i += 2)
> >>>>>>> + if (base[i] == wfe_option &&
> >>>>>>> + (base[i + 1] & CMDQ_OP_CODE_MASK) == wfe_op) {
> >>>>>>> + base[i] = CMDQ_JUMP_PASS;
> >>>>>>> + base[i + 1] = CMDQ_JUMP_BY_OFFSET;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> After using the command buffer as a void pointer a u64 pointer, we now
> >>>>>> reference to it as u32. I would prefer to explain here, how the command
> >>>>>> looks like we are searching for and use a for loop passing task->num_cmd
> >>>>>> instead.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will use u64* to rewrite the above code.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_task_exec(struct cmdq_task *task, struct cmdq_thread *thread)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = task->cmdq;
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long curr_pa, end_pa;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + WARN_ON(clk_prepare_enable(cmdq->clock) < 0);
> >>>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cmdq->exec_lock, flags);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> cmdq_task_exec is called with cmdq->task_mutex held, so why do we need
> >>>>>> the spin_lock here? Can't we just use one of the two?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We can drop task_mutex, but we will get some side effects.
> >>>>> 1. exec_lock needs to include more code, but I think it is not good for
> >>>>> spinlock.
> >>>>> 2. In cmdq_rec_flush_async(), task_mutex needs to protect
> >>>>> (1) cmdq->suspended, (2) cmdq_task_exec(), and
> >>>>> (3) cmdq_task_wait_release_schedule().
> >>>>> If we drop task_mutex, we have to put cmdq->suspended if condition
> >>>>> just before cmdq_task_exec() and inside exec_lock, and we have to
> >>>>> release task and its command buffer if error. This will let flow
> >>>>> become more complex and enlarge code size.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>
> >>>> Why do you need to protect cmdq_task_wait_release_schedule? We don't
> >>>> care about the order of the workqueue elements, do we?
> >>>
> >>> According to CK's comment, we have to ensure order to remove previous
> >>> task.
> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-May/005547.html
> >>>
> >>>> As far as I understand you would need to protect cmdq_task_acquire as
> >>>> well, to "ensure" continously growing pa_base. More on that below.
> >>>
> >>> We need to ensure continuous physical addresses in a task, but we don't
> >>> need to ensure continuous physical addresses between tasks.
> >>> So, I think it is unnecessary to protect by mutex or spinlock.
> >>>
> >>
> >> True, I didn't get that.
> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> + task->thread = thread;
> >>>>>>> + task->task_state = TASK_STATE_BUSY;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That was already set in cmdq_task_acquire, why do we need to set it here
> >>>>>> again?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will drop it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, but I think it makes more sense to drop it in cmdq_task_acquire
> >>>> instead.
> >>>
> >>> Will drop it in cmdq_task_acquire instead.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> + if (list_empty(&thread->task_busy_list)) {
> >>>>>>> + WARN_ON(cmdq_thread_reset(cmdq, thread) < 0);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, task->pa_base, CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, task->pa_base + task->command_size,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, CMDQ_THR_PRIORITY, CMDQ_THR_CFG);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, CMDQ_THR_IRQ_EN,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_IRQ_ENABLE);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, CMDQ_THR_ENABLED,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_ENABLE_TASK);
> >>>>>>> + } else {
> >>>>>>> + WARN_ON(cmdq_thread_suspend(cmdq, thread) < 0);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>>> + * check boundary condition
> >>>>>>> + * PC = END - 8, EOC is executed
> >>>>>>> + * PC = END, all CMDs are executed
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> + curr_pa = cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> + end_pa = cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> + if (curr_pa == end_pa - 8 || curr_pa == end_pa) {
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 8 refers to CMDQ_INST_SIZE, right?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, I will use CMDQ_INST_SIZE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> + /* set to this task directly */
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, task->pa_base,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> + } else {
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_task_insert_into_thread(task);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (thread == &cmdq->thread[CMDQ_THR_DISP_MAIN_IDX] ||
> >>>>>>> + thread == &cmdq->thread[CMDQ_THR_DISP_SUB_IDX])
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_task_remove_wfe(task);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We could do this check using the task->engine_flag, I suppose that's
> >>>>>> easier to undestand then.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will use task->engine_flag.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + smp_mb(); /* modify jump before enable thread */
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, task->pa_base + task->command_size,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_END_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + list_move_tail(&task->list_entry, &thread->task_busy_list);
> >>>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmdq->exec_lock, flags);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_handle_error_done(struct cmdq *cmdq,
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_thread *thread, u32 irq_flag)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task *task, *tmp, *curr_task = NULL;
> >>>>>>> + u32 curr_pa;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_cb_data cmdq_cb_data;
> >>>>>>> + bool err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (irq_flag & CMDQ_THR_IRQ_ERROR)
> >>>>>>> + err = true;
> >>>>>>> + else if (irq_flag & CMDQ_THR_IRQ_DONE)
> >>>>>>> + err = false;
> >>>>>>> + else
> >>>>>>> + return;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + curr_pa = cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(task, tmp, &thread->task_busy_list,
> >>>>>>> + list_entry) {
> >>>>>>> + if (curr_pa >= task->pa_base &&
> >>>>>>> + curr_pa < (task->pa_base + task->command_size))
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> What are you checking here? It seems as if you make some implcit
> >>>>>> assumptions about pa_base and the order of execution of commands in the
> >>>>>> thread. Is it save to do so? Does dma_alloc_coherent give any guarantees
> >>>>>> about dma_handle?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. Check what is the current running task in this GCE thread.
> >>>>> 2. Yes.
> >>>>> 3. Yes, CMDQ doesn't use iommu, so physical address is continuous.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, physical addresses might be continous, but AFAIK there is no
> >>>> guarantee that the dma_handle address is steadily growing, when calling
> >>>> dma_alloc_coherent. And if I understand the code correctly, you use this
> >>>> assumption to decide if the task picked from task_busy_list is currently
> >>>> executing. So I think this mecanism is not working.
> >>>
> >>> I don't use dma_handle address, and just use physical addresses.
> >>> From CPU's point of view, tasks are linked by the busy list.
> >>> From GCE's point of view, tasks are linked by the JUMP command.
> >>>
> >>>> In which cases does the HW thread raise an interrupt.
> >>>> In case of error. When does CMDQ_THR_IRQ_DONE get raised?
> >>>
> >>> GCE will raise interrupt if any task is done or error.
> >>> However, GCE is fast, so CPU may get multiple done tasks
> >>> when it is running ISR.
> >>>
> >>> In case of error, that GCE thread will pause and raise interrupt.
> >>> So, CPU may get multiple done tasks and one error task.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I think we should reimplement the ISR mechanism. Can't we just read
> >> CURR_IRQ_STATUS and THR_IRQ_STATUS in the handler and leave
> >> cmdq_handle_error_done to the thread_fn? You will need to pass
> >> information from the handler to thread_fn, but that shouldn't be an
> >> issue. AFAIK interrupts are disabled in the handler, so we should stay
> >> there as short as possible. Traversing task_busy_list is expensive, so
> >> we need to do it in a thread context.
> >
> > Actually, our initial implementation is similar to your suggestion,
> > but display needs CMDQ to return callback function very precisely,
> > else display will drop frame.
> > For display, CMDQ interrupt will be raised every 16 ~ 17 ms,
> > and CMDQ needs to call callback function in ISR.
> > If we defer callback to workqueue, the time interval may be larger than
> > 32 ms.sometimes.
> >
>
> I think the problem is, that you implemented the workqueue as a ordered
> workqueue, so there is no parallel processing. I'm still not sure why
> you need the workqueue to be ordered. Can you please explain.
The order should be kept.
Let me use mouse cursor as an example.
If task 1 means move mouse cursor to point A, task 2 means point B,
and task 3 means point C, our expected result is A -> B -> C.
If the order is not kept, the result could become A -> C -> B.
> >> I keep thinking about how to get rid of the two data structures,
> >> task_busy_list and the task_release_wq. We need the latter for the only
> >> sake of getting a timeout.
> >>
> >> Did you have a look on how the mailbox framework handles this?
> >> By the way, what is the reason to not implement the whole driver as a
> >> mailbox controller? For me, this driver looks like a good fit.
> >
> > CMDQ needs to encode commands for GCE hardware. We think this behavior
> > should be put in CMDQ driver, and client just call CMDQ functions.
> > Therefore, if we want to use mailbox framework, cmdq_rec must be
> > mailbox client, and the others must be mailbox controller.
> >
>
> You mean the functions to fill the cmdq_rec and execute it?
> I think this should be part of the driver.
Yes.
> Jassi, can you have a look on the interface this driver exports [0].
> They are needed to actually create the message which will be send.
> Could something like this be part of a mailbox driver?
>
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9140221/
>
> > However, if we use mailbox controller, CMDQ driver still needs to
> > control busy list for each GCE thread, and use workqueue to handle
> > timeout tasks.
> >
>
> Let me summarize my ideas around this driver:
> When we enter the ISR, we know that all task in task_busy_list before
> the entry which represents curr_task can be set to TASK_STATE_DONE.
> The curr_task could be TASK_STATE_ERROR if the corresponding bit in the
> irq status registers is set.
> Do we need to call the callback in the same order as the tasks got
> dispatched to the HW thread? If not, we could try to call all this
> callbacks in a multithreaded workqueue.
Yes, we should keep order.
> Regards,
> Matthias
Thanks,
HS
> > The only thing that we can borrow from mailbox framework is the send
> > (CMDQ flush) and receive (CMDQ callback) interface, However, we don't
> > think we can gain many benefits from it, and we have some overheads to
> > conform to mailbox interface.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>>>>>> + curr_task = task;
> >>>>>>> + if (task->cb.cb) {
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_cb_data.err = curr_task ? err : false;
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_cb_data.data = task->cb.data;
> >>>>>>> + task->cb.cb(cmdq_cb_data);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + task->task_state = (curr_task && err) ? TASK_STATE_ERROR :
> >>>>>>> + TASK_STATE_DONE;
> >>>>>>> + list_del(&task->list_entry);
> >>>>>>> + if (curr_task)
> >>>>>>> + break;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + wake_up(&thread->wait_task_done);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_thread_irq_handler(struct cmdq *cmdq, int tid)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_thread *thread = &cmdq->thread[tid];
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long flags = 0L;
> >>>>>>> + u32 irq_flag;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cmdq->exec_lock, flags);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + irq_flag = cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_IRQ_STATUS);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, ~irq_flag, CMDQ_THR_IRQ_STATUS);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>>> + * Another CPU core could run "release task" right before we acquire
> >>>>>>> + * the spin lock, and thus reset / disable this GCE thread, so we
> >>>>>>> + * need to check the enable bit of this GCE thread.
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> + if (!(cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_ENABLE_TASK) &
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_ENABLED))
> >>>>>>> + irq_flag = 0;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> cmdq_handle_error_done just retuns in this case. Programming this way
> >>>>>> just makes things confusing. What about:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> if (cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_ENABLE_TASK) &
> >>>>>> CMDQ_THR_ENABLED)
> >>>>>> cmdq_handle_error_done(cmdq, thread, irq_flag);
> >>>>>> else
> >>>>>> irq_flag = 0;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmdq->exec_lock, flags);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We still need to clear irq_flag if GCE thread is disabled.
> >>>>> So, I think we can just return here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> if (!(cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_ENABLE_TASK) &
> >>>>> CMDQ_THR_ENABLED))
> >>>>> return;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No, you can't just return, you need to unlock the spinlock.
> >>>> Anyway I would prefer it the other way round, as I put it in my last
> >>>> mail. Just delete the else branch, we don't need to set irq_flag to zero.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for my previous wrong reply since I merge your comment
> >>> and CK's comment.
> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-May/005547.html
> >>> So, I will put this if condition into cmdq_task_handle_error_result()
> >>> and then just return it if GCE thread is disabled.
> >>>
> >>
> >> You mean in cmdq_task_handle_done
> >> We should rename this functions to not create confusion.
> >
> > Sorry again. I mean in cmdq_handle_error_done().
> > This function handles both done and error.
> >
> > I agree the function name looks confusion.
> > I think it can be renamed to cmdq_thread_irq_handler()
> > since it is used to handle irq for GCE thread.
> >
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> >
> > Thanks,
> > HS
> >
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_handle_error_done(cmdq, thread, irq_flag);
> >>>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmdq->exec_lock, flags);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static irqreturn_t cmdq_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = dev;
> >>>>>>> + u32 irq_status;
> >>>>>>> + int i;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + irq_status = readl(cmdq->base + CMDQ_CURR_IRQ_STATUS);
> >>>>>>> + irq_status &= CMDQ_IRQ_MASK;
> >>>>>>> + irq_status ^= CMDQ_IRQ_MASK;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> irq_status can be much bigger then 3, which is the number of threads in
> >>>>>> the system (CMDQ_THR_MAX_COUNT). So why we use this mask here isn't
> >>>>>> clear to me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Our GCE hardware has 16 threads, but we only use 3 threads currently.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Ok, but please use bitops here.
> >>>
> >>> Will use bitops.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (!irq_status)
> >>>>>>> + return IRQ_NONE;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + while (irq_status) {
> >>>>>>> + i = ffs(irq_status) - 1;
> >>>>>>> + irq_status &= ~BIT(i);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_irq_handler(cmdq, i);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can you explain how the irq status register looks like, that would it
> >>>>>> make much easier to understand what happens here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bit 0 ~ 15 of irq status register represents GCE thread 0 ~ 15
> >>>>> interrupt. 0 means asserting interrupt; 1 means no interrupt.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks, that helped. :)
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_task_handle_error_result(struct cmdq_task *task)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We never check the return values, why do we have them?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will drop return value.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = task->cmdq;
> >>>>>>> + struct device *dev = cmdq->dev;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_thread *thread = task->thread;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task *next_task, *prev_task;
> >>>>>>> + u32 irq_flag;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* suspend GCE thread to ensure consistency */
> >>>>>>> + WARN_ON(cmdq_thread_suspend(cmdq, thread) < 0);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* ISR has handled this error task */
> >>>>>>> + if (task->task_state == TASK_STATE_ERROR) {
> >>>>>>> + next_task = list_first_entry_or_null(&thread->task_busy_list,
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task, list_entry);
> >>>>>>> + if (next_task) /* move to next task */
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, next_task->pa_base,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> We have to do this, as we suppose that the thread did not reach the jump
> >>>>>> instruction we put into it's command queue, right?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So this should then go into it's own function. In wait_release_work,
> >>>> something like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> if(task->task_state == TASK_STATE_ERROR)
> >>>> cmdq_task_handle_error(task)
> >>>
> >>> OK.
> >>> I will write new function cmdq_task_handle_error() to handle error case.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
> >>>>>>> + return -ECANCELED;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> if task_state != ERROR and != DONE. This means that the timeout of
> >>>>>> task_release_wq has timed out, right?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>>> + * Save next_task and prev_task in advance
> >>>>>>> + * since cmdq_handle_error_done will remove list_entry.
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> + next_task = prev_task = NULL;
> >>>>>>> + if (task->list_entry.next != &thread->task_busy_list)
> >>>>>>> + next_task = list_next_entry(task, list_entry);
> >>>>>>> + if (task->list_entry.prev != &thread->task_busy_list)
> >>>>>>> + prev_task = list_prev_entry(task, list_entry);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>>> + * Although IRQ is disabled, GCE continues to execute.
> >>>>>>> + * It may have pending IRQ before GCE thread is suspended,
> >>>>>>> + * so check this condition again.
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The first thing we did in this function was suspending the thread. Why
> >>>>>> do we need this then?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because timeout is CPU timeout not GCE timeout, GCE could just finish
> >>>>> this task before the GCE thread is suspended.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What are the reasons for a timeout? An error has happend, or the task is
> >>>> still executing.
> >>>
> >>> From GCE's point of view, this task is still executing.
> >>> But, it could be an error of client.
> >>> For example, task may never get event if display turn off hardware
> >>> before waiting for task to finish its work.
> >>>
> >>>>>> To be honest this whole functions looks really like a design error. We
> >>>>>> have to sperate the states much clearer so that it is possible to
> >>>>>> understand what is happening in the GCE. Isn't it for example posible to
> >>>>>> have worker queues for timed out tasks and tasks with an error? I'm not
> >>>>>> sure how to do this, actually I'm not sure if I really understood how
> >>>>>> this is supposed to work.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> GCE doesn't have timeout. The timeout is decided and controlled by CPU,
> >>>>> so we check timeout in release work.
> >>>>> For error and done, they are easy to check by register, and we have
> >>>>> already created release work for timeout. So, I don't think we need to
> >>>>> create work queue for each case.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I think, if we find in here, that the irq_flag is set, then the the
> >>>> interrupt handler was triggered and is spinning the spinlock. If this is
> >>>> not the case, we have a timeout and we handle this.
> >>>
> >>> I will write another function to handle error, and handle timeout here.
> >>>
> >>>>>> How much do we win, when we patch the thread command queue for every
> >>>>>> task we add, instead of just taking one task after another from the
> >>>>>> task_busy_list?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> GCE is used to help read/write registers with critical time limitation.
> >>>>> Sometimes, client may ask to process multiple tasks in a short period
> >>>>> of time, e.g. display flush multiple tasks for next vblank. So, CMDQ
> >>>>> shouldn't limit to process one task after another from the
> >>>>> task_busy_list. Currently, when interrupt or timeout, we will check
> >>>>> how many tasks are done, and which one is error or timeout.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So I suppose the device driver who use this are interested in throughput
> >>>> and not in latency. The callback of every
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> + irq_flag = cmdq_thread_readl(thread, CMDQ_THR_IRQ_STATUS);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_handle_error_done(cmdq, thread, irq_flag);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, ~irq_flag, CMDQ_THR_IRQ_STATUS);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (task->task_state == TASK_STATE_DONE) {
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (task->task_state == TASK_STATE_ERROR) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "task 0x%p error\n", task);
> >>>>>>> + if (next_task) /* move to next task */
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, next_task->pa_base,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
> >>>>>>> + return -ECANCELED;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* Task is running, so we force to remove it. */
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "task 0x%p timeout or killed\n", task);
> >>>>>>> + task->task_state = TASK_STATE_ERROR;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (prev_task) {
> >>>>>>> + u64 *prev_va = prev_task->va_base;
> >>>>>>> + u64 *curr_va = task->va_base;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* copy JUMP instruction */
> >>>>>>> + prev_va[prev_task->num_cmd - 1] = curr_va[task->num_cmd - 1];
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_invalidate_fetched_data(thread);
> >>>>>>> + } else if (next_task) { /* move to next task */
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_writel(thread, next_task->pa_base,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_CURR_ADDR);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + list_del(&task->list_entry);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_resume(thread);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* call cb here to prevent lock */
> >>>>>>> + if (task->cb.cb) {
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_cb_data cmdq_cb_data;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_cb_data.err = true;
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_cb_data.data = task->cb.data;
> >>>>>>> + task->cb.cb(cmdq_cb_data);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + return -ECANCELED;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_task_wait_release_work(struct work_struct *work_item)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task *task = container_of(work_item, struct cmdq_task,
> >>>>>>> + release_work);
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = task->cmdq;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_thread *thread = task->thread;
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long flags;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + wait_event_timeout(thread->wait_task_done,
> >>>>>>> + task->task_state != TASK_STATE_BUSY,
> >>>>>>> + msecs_to_jiffies(CMDQ_TIMEOUT_MS));
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cmdq->exec_lock, flags);
> >>>>>>> + if (task->task_state != TASK_STATE_DONE)
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_task_handle_error_result(task);
> >>>>>>> + if (list_empty(&thread->task_busy_list))
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_thread_disable(cmdq, thread);
> >>>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmdq->exec_lock, flags);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* release regardless of success or not */
> >>>>>>> + clk_disable_unprepare(cmdq->clock);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_task_release(task);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void cmdq_task_wait_release_schedule(struct cmdq_task *task)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = task->cmdq;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + INIT_WORK(&task->release_work, cmdq_task_wait_release_work);
> >>>>>>> + queue_work(cmdq->task_release_wq, &task->release_work);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_rec_realloc_cmd_buffer(struct cmdq_rec *rec, size_t size)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + void *new_buf;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + new_buf = krealloc(rec->buf, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> >>>>>>> + if (!new_buf)
> >>>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>>>> + rec->buf = new_buf;
> >>>>>>> + rec->buf_size = size;
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_base *cmdq_register_device(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_base *cmdq_base;
> >>>>>>> + struct resource res;
> >>>>>>> + int subsys;
> >>>>>>> + u32 base;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (of_address_to_resource(dev->of_node, 0, &res))
> >>>>>>> + return NULL;
> >>>>>>> + base = (u32)res.start;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + subsys = cmdq_subsys_base_to_id(base >> 16);
> >>>>>>> + if (subsys < 0)
> >>>>>>> + return NULL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_base = devm_kmalloc(dev, sizeof(*cmdq_base), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> + if (!cmdq_base)
> >>>>>>> + return NULL;
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_base->subsys = subsys;
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_base->base = base;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + return cmdq_base;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_register_device);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_create(struct device *dev, u64 engine_flag,
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_rec **rec_ptr)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_rec *rec;
> >>>>>>> + int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + rec = kzalloc(sizeof(*rec), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> + if (!rec)
> >>>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>>>> + rec->cmdq = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >>>>>>> + rec->engine_flag = engine_flag;
> >>>>>>> + err = cmdq_rec_realloc_cmd_buffer(rec, CMDQ_INITIAL_CMD_BLOCK_SIZE);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just pass PAGE_SIZE here, no need for CMDQ_INITIAL_CMD_BLOCK_SIZE.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will do.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> + if (err < 0) {
> >>>>>>> + kfree(rec);
> >>>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + *rec_ptr = rec;
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_rec_create);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_rec_append_command(struct cmdq_rec *rec, enum cmdq_code code,
> >>>>>>> + u32 arg_a, u32 arg_b)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + u64 *cmd_ptr;
> >>>>>>> + int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (WARN_ON(rec->finalized))
> >>>>>>> + return -EBUSY;
> >>>>>>> + if (code < CMDQ_CODE_MOVE || code > CMDQ_CODE_EOC)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> cmdq_rec_append_command is just called from inside this driver and code
> >>>>>> is a enum. We can expect it to be correct, no need for this check.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will drop this check.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> + if (unlikely(rec->command_size + CMDQ_INST_SIZE > rec->buf_size)) {
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> command_size is the offset into the buffer to which a new command is
> >>>>>> written, so this name is highly confusing. I wonder if this would be
> >>>>>> easier to understand if we redefine command_size to something like the
> >>>>>> number of commands and divide/multiply CMDQ_INST_SIZE where this is needed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I can rename command_size to cmd_buf_size and calculate num_cmd by
> >>>>> dividing CMDQ_INST_SIZE.
> >>>>> What do you think?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> + err = cmdq_rec_realloc_cmd_buffer(rec, rec->buf_size * 2);
> >>>>>>> + if (err < 0)
> >>>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + cmd_ptr = rec->buf + rec->command_size;
> >>>>>>> + (*cmd_ptr) = (u64)((code << CMDQ_OP_CODE_SHIFT) | arg_a) << 32 | arg_b;
> >>>>>>> + rec->command_size += CMDQ_INST_SIZE;
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_write(struct cmdq_rec *rec, u32 value, struct cmdq_base *base,
> >>>>>>> + u32 offset)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + u32 arg_a = ((base->base + offset) & CMDQ_ARG_A_WRITE_MASK) |
> >>>>>>> + ((base->subsys & CMDQ_SUBSYS_MASK) << CMDQ_SUBSYS_SHIFT);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> base->subsys is the id from gce_sybsys, so we can expect it to be
> >>>>>> correct, no need to mask with CMDQ_SUBSYS_MASK.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will drop it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> + return cmdq_rec_append_command(rec, CMDQ_CODE_WRITE, arg_a, value);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_rec_write);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_write_mask(struct cmdq_rec *rec, u32 value,
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_base *base, u32 offset, u32 mask)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + u32 offset_mask = offset;
> >>>>>>> + int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (mask != 0xffffffff) {
> >>>>>>> + err = cmdq_rec_append_command(rec, CMDQ_CODE_MOVE, 0, ~mask);
> >>>>>>> + if (err < 0)
> >>>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>>> + offset_mask |= CMDQ_WRITE_ENABLE_MASK;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + return cmdq_rec_write(rec, value, base, offset_mask);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_rec_write_mask);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_wfe(struct cmdq_rec *rec, enum cmdq_event event)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + u32 arg_b;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (event >= CMDQ_MAX_HW_EVENT_COUNT || event < 0)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /*
> >>>>>>> + * bit 0-11: wait value
> >>>>>>> + * bit 15: 1 - wait, 0 - no wait
> >>>>>>> + * bit 16-27: update value
> >>>>>>> + * bit 31: 1 - update, 0 - no update
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I don't understand this comments. What are they for?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is for WFE command. I will comment it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> + arg_b = CMDQ_WFE_UPDATE | CMDQ_WFE_WAIT | CMDQ_WFE_WAIT_VALUE;
> >>>>>>> + return cmdq_rec_append_command(rec, CMDQ_CODE_WFE, event, arg_b);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_rec_wfe);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_clear_event(struct cmdq_rec *rec, enum cmdq_event event)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + if (event >= CMDQ_MAX_HW_EVENT_COUNT || event < 0)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + return cmdq_rec_append_command(rec, CMDQ_CODE_WFE, event,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_WFE_UPDATE);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_rec_clear_event);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_rec_finalize(struct cmdq_rec *rec)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (rec->finalized)
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* insert EOC and generate IRQ for each command iteration */
> >>>>>>> + err = cmdq_rec_append_command(rec, CMDQ_CODE_EOC, 0, CMDQ_EOC_IRQ_EN);
> >>>>>>> + if (err < 0)
> >>>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* JUMP to end */
> >>>>>>> + err = cmdq_rec_append_command(rec, CMDQ_CODE_JUMP, 0, CMDQ_JUMP_PASS);
> >>>>>>> + if (err < 0)
> >>>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Does this need to be atomic?
> >>>>>> What happens if after CODE_EOC and before CODE_JUMP some
> >>>>>> write/read/event gets added?
> >>>>>> What happens if more commands get added to the queue after CODE_JUMP,
> >>>>>> but before finalized is set to true. Why don't you use atomic functions
> >>>>>> to access finalized?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Since cmdq_rec doesn't guarantee thread safe, mutex is needed when
> >>>>> client uses cmdq_rec.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Well I think that rec->finalized tries to implement this, but might
> >>>> fail, if two kernel threads work on the same cmdq_rec.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> + rec->finalized = true;
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_flush_async(struct cmdq_rec *rec, cmdq_async_flush_cb cb,
> >>>>>>> + void *data)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = rec->cmdq;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task *task;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_task_cb task_cb;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_thread *thread;
> >>>>>>> + int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + mutex_lock(&cmdq->task_mutex);
> >>>>>>> + if (cmdq->suspended) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(cmdq->dev, "%s is called after suspended\n", __func__);
> >>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&cmdq->task_mutex);
> >>>>>>> + return -EPERM;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + err = cmdq_rec_finalize(rec);
> >>>>>>> + if (err < 0) {
> >>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&cmdq->task_mutex);
> >>>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + task_cb.cb = cb;
> >>>>>>> + task_cb.data = data;
> >>>>>>> + task = cmdq_task_acquire(rec, task_cb);
> >>>>>>> + if (!task) {
> >>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&cmdq->task_mutex);
> >>>>>>> + return -EFAULT;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + thread = &cmdq->thread[cmdq_eng_get_thread(task->engine_flag)];
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_task_exec(task, thread);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_task_wait_release_schedule(task);
> >>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&cmdq->task_mutex);
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_rec_flush_async);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_flush_completion {
> >>>>>>> + struct completion cmplt;
> >>>>>>> + bool err;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_rec_flush_cb(struct cmdq_cb_data data)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_flush_completion *cmplt = data.data;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmplt->err = data.err;
> >>>>>>> + complete(&cmplt->cmplt);
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_flush(struct cmdq_rec *rec)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_flush_completion cmplt;
> >>>>>>> + int err;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + init_completion(&cmplt.cmplt);
> >>>>>>> + err = cmdq_rec_flush_async(rec, cmdq_rec_flush_cb, &cmplt);
> >>>>>>> + if (err < 0)
> >>>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>>> + wait_for_completion(&cmplt.cmplt);
> >>>>>>> + return cmplt.err ? -EFAULT : 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_rec_flush);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +void cmdq_rec_destroy(struct cmdq_rec *rec)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + kfree(rec->buf);
> >>>>>>> + kfree(rec);
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cmdq_rec_destroy);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static bool cmdq_task_is_empty(struct cmdq *cmdq)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_thread *thread;
> >>>>>>> + int i;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cmdq->thread); i++) {
> >>>>>>> + thread = &cmdq->thread[i];
> >>>>>>> + if (!list_empty(&thread->task_busy_list))
> >>>>>>> + return false;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + return true;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_suspend(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >>>>>>> + u32 exec_threads;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + mutex_lock(&cmdq->task_mutex);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq->suspended = true;
> >>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&cmdq->task_mutex);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + exec_threads = readl(cmdq->base + CMDQ_CURR_LOADED_THR);
> >>>>>>> + if ((exec_threads & CMDQ_THR_EXECUTING) && !cmdq_task_is_empty(cmdq)) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "wait active tasks timeout.\n");
> >>>>>>> + flush_workqueue(cmdq->task_release_wq);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_resume(struct device *dev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq->suspended = false;
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + destroy_workqueue(cmdq->task_release_wq);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq->task_release_wq = NULL;
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int cmdq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >>>>>>> + struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> >>>>>>> + struct resource *res;
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq;
> >>>>>>> + int err, i;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cmdq), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> + if (!cmdq)
> >>>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>>>> + cmdq->dev = dev;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> >>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(cmdq->base)) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to ioremap gce\n");
> >>>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(cmdq->base);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> >>>>>>> + if (!cmdq->irq) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get irq\n");
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "cmdq device: addr:0x%p, va:0x%p, irq:%d\n",
> >>>>>>> + dev, cmdq->base, cmdq->irq);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + mutex_init(&cmdq->task_mutex);
> >>>>>>> + spin_lock_init(&cmdq->exec_lock);
> >>>>>>> + cmdq->task_release_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
> >>>>>>> + "%s", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI,
> >>>>>>> + "cmdq_task_wait_release");
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cmdq->thread); i++) {
> >>>>>>> + cmdq->thread[i].base = cmdq->base + CMDQ_THR_BASE +
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_THR_SHIFT * i;
> >>>>>>> + init_waitqueue_head(&cmdq->thread[i].wait_task_done);
> >>>>>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cmdq->thread[i].task_busy_list);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cmdq);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + err = devm_request_irq(dev, cmdq->irq, cmdq_irq_handler, IRQF_SHARED,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_DRIVER_DEVICE_NAME, cmdq);
> >>>>>>> + if (err < 0) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register ISR (%d)\n", err);
> >>>>>>> + goto fail;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + cmdq->clock = devm_clk_get(dev, CMDQ_CLK_NAME);
> >>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(cmdq->clock)) {
> >>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get clk:%s\n", CMDQ_CLK_NAME);
> >>>>>>> + err = PTR_ERR(cmdq->clock);
> >>>>>>> + goto fail;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +fail:
> >>>>>>> + cmdq_remove(pdev);
> >>>>>>> + return err;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static const struct dev_pm_ops cmdq_pm_ops = {
> >>>>>>> + .suspend = cmdq_suspend,
> >>>>>>> + .resume = cmdq_resume,
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static const struct of_device_id cmdq_of_ids[] = {
> >>>>>>> + {.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-gce",},
> >>>>>>> + {}
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static struct platform_driver cmdq_drv = {
> >>>>>>> + .probe = cmdq_probe,
> >>>>>>> + .remove = cmdq_remove,
> >>>>>>> + .driver = {
> >>>>>>> + .name = CMDQ_DRIVER_DEVICE_NAME,
> >>>>>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >>>>>>> + .pm = &cmdq_pm_ops,
> >>>>>>> + .of_match_table = cmdq_of_ids,
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +builtin_platform_driver(cmdq_drv);
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/include/soc/mediatek/cmdq.h b/include/soc/mediatek/cmdq.h
> >>>>>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>> index 0000000..60eef3d
> >>>>>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>>>>> +++ b/include/soc/mediatek/cmdq.h
> >>>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
> >>>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2015 MediaTek Inc.
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >>>>>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> >>>>>>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> >>>>>>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> >>>>>>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> >>>>>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#ifndef __MTK_CMDQ_H__
> >>>>>>> +#define __MTK_CMDQ_H__
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>>>>>> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +enum cmdq_eng {
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_AAL,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_COLOR0,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_COLOR1,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_DPI0,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_DSI0,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_DSI1,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_GAMMA,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_OD,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_OVL0,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_OVL1,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_PWM0,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_PWM1,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_RDMA0,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_RDMA1,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_RDMA2,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_UFOE,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_WDMA0,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_DISP_WDMA1,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_ENG_MAX,
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/* events for CMDQ and display */
> >>>>>>> +enum cmdq_event {
> >>>>>>> + /* Display start of frame(SOF) events */
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_OVL0_SOF = 11,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_OVL1_SOF = 12,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_RDMA0_SOF = 13,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_RDMA1_SOF = 14,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_RDMA2_SOF = 15,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_WDMA0_SOF = 16,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_WDMA1_SOF = 17,
> >>>>>>> + /* Display end of frame(EOF) events */
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_OVL0_EOF = 39,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_OVL1_EOF = 40,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_RDMA0_EOF = 41,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_RDMA1_EOF = 42,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_RDMA2_EOF = 43,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_WDMA0_EOF = 44,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_WDMA1_EOF = 45,
> >>>>>>> + /* Mutex end of frame(EOF) events */
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_MUTEX0_STREAM_EOF = 53,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_MUTEX1_STREAM_EOF = 54,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_MUTEX2_STREAM_EOF = 55,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_MUTEX3_STREAM_EOF = 56,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_MUTEX4_STREAM_EOF = 57,
> >>>>>>> + /* Display underrun events */
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_RDMA0_UNDERRUN = 63,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_RDMA1_UNDERRUN = 64,
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_EVENT_DISP_RDMA2_UNDERRUN = 65,
> >>>>>>> + /* Keep this at the end of HW events */
> >>>>>>> + CMDQ_MAX_HW_EVENT_COUNT = 260,
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_cb_data {
> >>>>>>> + bool err;
> >>>>>>> + void *data;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +typedef int (*cmdq_async_flush_cb)(struct cmdq_cb_data data);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_task;
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_rec {
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq *cmdq;
> >>>>>>> + u64 engine_flag;
> >>>>>>> + size_t command_size;
> >>>>>>> + void *buf;
> >>>>>>> + size_t buf_size;
> >>>>>>> + bool finalized;
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>
> >>>> Why do we need cmdq_rec at all? Can't we just use the cmdq_task for that
> >>>> and this way make the driver less complex?
> >>>
> >>> There are two main reasons for cmdq_rec.
> >>> 1. It is slow to access dma too frequently.
> >>> So, we append commands to cacheable memory, and then flush to dma.
> >>> 2. cmdq_rec is not thread safe, but cmdq_task needs thread safe.
> >>> If we merge them, we need to take care of some synchronization
> >>> issues.
> >>>
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_base {
> >>>>>>> + int subsys;
> >>>>>>> + u32 base;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> subsys can always be calculated via cmdq_subsys_base_to_id(base >> 16)
> >>>>>> so we can get rid of the struct, right?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Current subsys method is based on previous comment from Daniel Kurtz.
> >>>>> Please take a look of our previous discussion.
> >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-February/004483.html
> >>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I have to look deeper into this, but from what I read, the proposal from
> >>>> Daniel [1] seems good to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8068311/
> >>>
> >>> The initial proposal has some problem, so please see the follow-up
> >>> discussions. Thanks.
> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-February/003972.html
> >>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-February/004483.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>>> +};
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>>> + * cmdq_register_device() - register device which needs CMDQ
> >>>>>>> + * @dev: device
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Return: cmdq_base pointer or NULL for failed
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +struct cmdq_base *cmdq_register_device(struct device *dev);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>>> + * cmdq_rec_create() - create command queue record
> >>>>>>> + * @dev: device
> >>>>>>> + * @engine_flag: command queue engine flag
> >>>>>>> + * @rec_ptr: command queue record pointer to retrieve cmdq_rec
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Return: 0 for success; else the error code is returned
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_create(struct device *dev, u64 engine_flag,
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_rec **rec_ptr);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>>> + * cmdq_rec_write() - append write command to the command queue record
> >>>>>>> + * @rec: the command queue record
> >>>>>>> + * @value: the specified target register value
> >>>>>>> + * @base: the command queue base
> >>>>>>> + * @offset: register offset from module base
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Return: 0 for success; else the error code is returned
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_write(struct cmdq_rec *rec, u32 value,
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_base *base, u32 offset);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>>> + * cmdq_rec_write_mask() - append write command with mask to the command
> >>>>>>> + * queue record
> >>>>>>> + * @rec: the command queue record
> >>>>>>> + * @value: the specified target register value
> >>>>>>> + * @base: the command queue base
> >>>>>>> + * @offset: register offset from module base
> >>>>>>> + * @mask: the specified target register mask
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Return: 0 for success; else the error code is returned
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_write_mask(struct cmdq_rec *rec, u32 value,
> >>>>>>> + struct cmdq_base *base, u32 offset, u32 mask);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>>> + * cmdq_rec_wfe() - append wait for event command to the command queue reco rd
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> reco rd -> record
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Will fix it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Matthias
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> + * @rec: the command queue record
> >>>>>>> + * @event: the desired event type to "wait and CLEAR"
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Return: 0 for success; else the error code is returned
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_wfe(struct cmdq_rec *rec, enum cmdq_event event);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>>> + * cmdq_rec_clear_event() - append clear event command to the command queue
> >>>>>>> + * record
> >>>>>>> + * @rec: the command queue record
> >>>>>>> + * @event: the desired event to be cleared
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Return: 0 for success; else the error code is returned
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_clear_event(struct cmdq_rec *rec, enum cmdq_event event);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>>> + * cmdq_rec_flush() - trigger CMDQ to execute the recorded commands
> >>>>>>> + * @rec: the command queue record
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Return: 0 for success; else the error code is returned
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Trigger CMDQ to execute the recorded commands. Note that this is a
> >>>>>>> + * synchronous flush function. When the function returned, the recorded
> >>>>>>> + * commands have been done.
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_flush(struct cmdq_rec *rec);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>>> + * cmdq_rec_flush_async() - trigger CMDQ to asynchronously execute the recorded
> >>>>>>> + * commands and call back after ISR is finished
> >>>>>>> + * @rec: the command queue record
> >>>>>>> + * @cb: called in the end of CMDQ ISR
> >>>>>>> + * @data: this data will pass back to cb
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Return: 0 for success; else the error code is returned
> >>>>>>> + *
> >>>>>>> + * Trigger CMDQ to asynchronously execute the recorded commands and call back
> >>>>>>> + * after ISR is finished. Note that this is an ASYNC function. When the function
> >>>>>>> + * returned, it may or may not be finished. The ISR callback function is called
> >>>>>>> + * in the end of ISR.
> >>>>
> >>>> "The callback is called from the ISR."
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +int cmdq_rec_flush_async(struct cmdq_rec *rec, cmdq_async_flush_cb cb,
> >>>>>>> + void *data);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>>> + * cmdq_rec_destroy() - destroy command queue record
> >>>>>>> + * @rec: the command queue record
> >>>>>>> + */
> >>>>>>> +void cmdq_rec_destroy(struct cmdq_rec *rec);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +#endif /* __MTK_CMDQ_H__ */
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> HS
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> HS
> >>>
> >
> >
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list