[PATCH v3 3/5] arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Fri Jun 3 02:52:30 PDT 2016
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:28:09AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Use the same tactic to cpu and numa-distance nodes.
Sorry, I don't understand... :/
Will
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen at huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> index c7fe3ec..2601660 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
> + pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> ret = memblock_set_node(start, (end - start), &memblock.memory, nid);
> if (ret < 0) {
> pr_err("NUMA: memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node %d\n",
> --
> 2.5.0
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list