[PATCH 2/3] phy: rockchip-emmc: Be tolerant to card clock of 0 in power on
Ulf Hansson
ulf.hansson at linaro.org
Mon Jul 25 00:37:51 PDT 2016
On 25 July 2016 at 07:57, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com> wrote:
> Ulf,
>
> On Saturday 23 July 2016 03:09 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 29 June 2016 at 17:18, Doug Anderson <dianders at chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Kishon,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Monday 27 June 2016 11:09 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>>>>> It's possible that there are some reasons to turn the PHY on while the
>>>>> clock is 0. In this case we just won't wait for the DLL to lock.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a bit of a stopgap until we figure out exactly when we're
>>>>> supposed to wait for the DLL to lock and when we're supposed to power
>>>>> cycle the PHY.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note: this patch should help with suspend/resume where the system will
>>>>> try to turn the PHY back on when the clock is 0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders at chromium.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>>>>> index 9dce958233a0..a2aa6aca7dec 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>>>>> @@ -88,15 +88,36 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
>>>>> unsigned int caldone;
>>>>> unsigned int dllrdy;
>>>>> unsigned int freqsel = PHYCTRL_FREQSEL_200M;
>>>>> + unsigned long rate;
>>>>> unsigned long timeout;
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (rk_phy->emmcclk != NULL) {
>>>>> - unsigned long rate = clk_get_rate(rk_phy->emmcclk);
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * Keep phyctrl_pdb and phyctrl_endll low to allow
>>>>> + * initialization of CALIO state M/C DFFs
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
>>>>> + rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_CON6,
>>>>> + HIWORD_UPDATE(PHYCTRL_PDB_PWR_OFF,
>>>>> + PHYCTRL_PDB_MASK,
>>>>> + PHYCTRL_PDB_SHIFT));
>>>>> + regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
>>>>> + rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_CON6,
>>>>> + HIWORD_UPDATE(PHYCTRL_ENDLL_DISABLE,
>>>>> + PHYCTRL_ENDLL_MASK,
>>>>> + PHYCTRL_ENDLL_SHIFT));
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Already finish power_off above */
>>>>> + if (on_off == PHYCTRL_PDB_PWR_OFF)
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + rate = clk_get_rate(rk_phy->emmcclk);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (rate != 0) {
>>>>> unsigned long ideal_rate;
>>>>> unsigned long diff;
>>>>>
>>>>> switch (rate) {
>>>>> - case 0 ... 74999999:
>>>>> + case 1 ... 74999999:
>>>>> ideal_rate = 50000000;
>>>>> freqsel = PHYCTRL_FREQSEL_50M;
>>>>> break;
>>>>> @@ -127,25 +148,6 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> - * Keep phyctrl_pdb and phyctrl_endll low to allow
>>>>> - * initialization of CALIO state M/C DFFs
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
>>>>> - rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_CON6,
>>>>> - HIWORD_UPDATE(PHYCTRL_PDB_PWR_OFF,
>>>>> - PHYCTRL_PDB_MASK,
>>>>> - PHYCTRL_PDB_SHIFT));
>>>>> - regmap_write(rk_phy->reg_base,
>>>>> - rk_phy->reg_offset + GRF_EMMCPHY_CON6,
>>>>> - HIWORD_UPDATE(PHYCTRL_ENDLL_DISABLE,
>>>>> - PHYCTRL_ENDLL_MASK,
>>>>> - PHYCTRL_ENDLL_SHIFT));
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /* Already finish power_off above */
>>>>> - if (on_off == PHYCTRL_PDB_PWR_OFF)
>>>>> - return 0;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> * According to the user manual, calpad calibration
>>>>> * cycle takes more than 2us without the minimal recommended
>>>>> * value, so we may need a little margin here
>>>>> @@ -183,6 +185,19 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
>>>>> HIWORD_UPDATE(PHYCTRL_ENDLL_ENABLE,
>>>>> PHYCTRL_ENDLL_MASK,
>>>>> PHYCTRL_ENDLL_SHIFT));
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * We turned on the DLL even though the rate was 0 because we the
>>>>> + * clock might be turned on later. ...but we can't wait for the DLL
>>>>> + * to lock when the rate is 0 because it will never lock with no
>>>>> + * input clock.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Technically we should be checking the lock later when the clock
>>>>> + * is turned on, but for now we won't.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (rate == 0)
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>
>>>> Why not return initially from rockchip_emmc_phy_power if the clock rate is '0'.
>>>> Are there other functions to lock the DLL apart from phy_power?
>>>
>>> Yeah, it's a big ugly right now. This ugliness is really needed
>>> because of <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9201035/> because:
>>>
>>> 1. We power on the PHY at probe time and the card clock is in an
>>> unknown state at that time. It will be reported as 0 right now, but
>>> it may or may not actually be 0.
>>>
>>> 2. We don't have an easy way to call back into the PHY when we
>>> actually set the clock to a low rate (like 400kHz) for ID mode.
>>> Before this series I tried to power the PHY off and on for every clock
>>> change, but apparently that was causing problems.
>>>
>>>
>>> As talked about in <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9201035/>, I
>>> think the right answer is to figure out how to get the common clock
>>> framework notifications to happen for the card clock and then remove
>>> the wholesale PHY power off / power on for every clock change. The
>>> PHY itself can register for the clock change notifications and figure
>>> out how much or how little to do on every clock change.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, as also discussed in the other patch, it's not trivial
>>> to do this because I think it requires surgery on the main SDHCI
>>> driver to change the way it deals with the card clock. I'm not sure I
>>> have time for this delicate surgery right now and I'm hoping that
>>> perhaps Shawn will be able to help figure something out (maybe?) or I
>>> can try coming back to it later.
>>>
>>>
>>> In any case, I think a wholesale revert of my previous 150 MHz series
>>> probably puts us in a worse state than we started with, so I was just
>>> proposing reverting the one patch. Once we do that, this PHY patch
>>> helps keep us in a sane state (keeps suspend/resume working).
>>>
>>>
>>> -Doug
>>
>> Doug, Kishon,
>>
>> Did you agree on how to move forward with this change?
>
> I think still few things are not very clear especially on what should be
> handled in PHY when the clock rate changes or if any new PHY APIs are required
> to handle any clock changes etc..
> But since this actually gets MMC working in rockchip, I'd be okay to merge this
> now. Though I'd expect this to be refined in the future release cycles.
Okay.
>
> FWIW:
> Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
I assume it's okay that I queue this via my mmc tree then. If not, please tell!
Kind regards
Uffe
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list