[PATCH] gpio: document how to order GPIO controllers
Rob Herring
robh at kernel.org
Sun Jul 17 15:03:09 PDT 2016
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 11:34:37AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > [Rob]:
>
> >> Like SPI and I2C, I'm against further abuse of aliases for this purpose
> >> [1].
>
> So what about the usecase for serial ports, where we use this
> to make sure the console come out where we want it? Is that
> also considered abuse or legitimate use? Note: I'm not trying to be
> snarky, I'm trying to understand what is the right and wrong use
> of alias. I'm confused about it right now :(
I guess it comes down to how ingrained the usage of any numbering is.
For consoles, it was pretty important to maintain numbering and no
alternative. But now with stdout-path that is less important. Perhaps if
you have inittab with tty devices, then it is still needed.
So I guess I would summarize the requirement to be only cases needing to
maintain numbering for existing userspace. The only users really caring
about this have been on N900.
Rob
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list