[PATCH v15 01/10] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature

[David Long]

On 07/15/2016 06:57 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 12:35:45PM -0400, David Long wrote:
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
>> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
>>   #define COMPAT_PT_DATA_ADDR		0x10004
>>   #define COMPAT_PT_TEXT_END_ADDR		0x10008
>>   #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> +#include <linux/bug.h>
>>
>>   /* sizeof(struct user) for AArch32 */
>>   #define COMPAT_USER_SZ	296
>> @@ -119,6 +120,8 @@ struct pt_regs {
>>   	u64 syscallno;
>>   };
>>
>> +#define MAX_REG_OFFSET offsetof(struct pt_regs, pstate)
>> +
>>   #define arch_has_single_step()	(1)
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> @@ -147,6 +150,55 @@ struct pt_regs {
>>   #define user_stack_pointer(regs) \
>>   	(!compat_user_mode(regs) ? (regs)->sp : (regs)->compat_sp)
>>
>> +extern int regs_query_register_offset(const char *name);
>> +extern const char *regs_query_register_name(unsigned int offset);
>
> Is regs_query_register_offset() used anywhere? I grep'ed the kernel with
> these patches applied but couldn't find any use.
>

It's referenced in kernel/trace/trace_probe.c.

>> +extern bool regs_within_kernel_stack(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr);
>
> This one only seems to be used in arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c. Can we
> make it static and remove the declaration?
>

OK.

Thanks,
-dl