[PATCH 1/1] arm64/hugetlb: clear PG_dcache_clean if the page is dirty when munmap
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Tue Jul 12 08:35:36 PDT 2016
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 08:43:32PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> On 2016/7/9 0:13, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:24:26PM +0800, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
> >> On 2016/7/8 21:54, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>> ------------8<----------------
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c b/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
> >>> index dbd12ea8ce68..c753fa804165 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
> >>> @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ void __sync_icache_dcache(pte_t pte, unsigned long addr)
> >>> if (!page_mapping(page))
> >>> return;
> >>>
> >>> - if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_dcache_clean, &page->flags))
> >>> + if (!test_and_set_bit(PG_dcache_clean, &page->flags) ||
> >>> + PageDirty(page))
> >>> sync_icache_aliases(page_address(page),
> >>> PAGE_SIZE << compound_order(page));
> >>> else if (icache_is_aivivt())
> >>> ----------------8<---------------------
> >>>
> >>> BTW, can you make your tests (source) available somewhere?
> >>
> >> Both cases worked well with this patch.
> >
> > Now I'm even more confused ;). IIUC, after an msync() in user space we
> > should flush the pages to disk via write_cache_pages(). This function
> > calls clear_page_dirty_for_io() after which PageDirty() is no longer
> > true. I can't tell how a subsequent mmap() can see the written pages as
> > dirty.
>
> As my tracing, both cases invoked empty function.
>
> int vfs_fsync_range(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
> ......
> return file->f_op->fsync(file, start, end, datasync);
> }
>
> const struct file_operations hugetlbfs_file_operations = {
> .fsync = noop_fsync,
>
> static const struct file_operations shmem_file_operations = {
> .mmap = shmem_mmap,
> #ifdef CONFIG_TMPFS
> .fsync = noop_fsync,
I was referring to standard filesystem (e.g. ext4) writes where, IIUC,
the PageDirty() status is cleared after I/O but it's not necessarily
removed from the page cache.
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list