[PATCH v8 09/17] KVM: arm64: introduce ITS emulation file with MMIO framework
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Fri Jul 8 06:55:37 PDT 2016
On 08/07/16 14:34, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 05/07/16 12:23, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> The ARM GICv3 ITS emulation code goes into a separate file, but needs
>> to be connected to the GICv3 emulation, of which it is an option.
>> The ITS MMIO handlers require the respective ITS pointer to be passed in,
>> so we amend the existing VGIC MMIO framework to let it cope with that.
>> Also we introduce the basic ITS data structure and initialize it, but
>> don't return any success yet, as we are not yet ready for the show.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
>> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 14 +++++-
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c | 40 +++++++--------
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c | 36 +++++++++++---
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.h | 31 +++++++++---
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 7 +++
>> 8 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> index f00b2cd..a5b9664 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> @@ -29,5 +29,6 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.o
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.o
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.o
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.o
>> +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-its.o
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/arch_timer.o
>> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU) += $(KVM)/arm/pmu.o
>> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>> index f6f860d..f606641 100644
>> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>> @@ -108,15 +108,27 @@ struct vgic_irq {
>> };
>>
>> struct vgic_register_region;
>> +struct vgic_its;
>>
>> struct vgic_io_device {
>> gpa_t base_addr;
>> - struct kvm_vcpu *redist_vcpu;
>> + union {
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *redist_vcpu;
>> + struct vgic_its *its;
>> + };
>
> The only question that springs to mind is...
>
>> const struct vgic_register_region *regions;
>> int nr_regions;
>> struct kvm_io_device dev;
>> };
>>
>> +struct vgic_its {
>> + /* The base address of the ITS control register frame */
>> + gpa_t vgic_its_base;
>> +
>> + bool enabled;
>> + struct vgic_io_device iodev;
>> +};
>> +
>> struct vgic_dist {
>> bool in_kernel;
>> bool ready;
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..ab8d244
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
>> +/*
>> + * GICv3 ITS emulation
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2015,2016 ARM Ltd.
>> + * Author: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>> + * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
>> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +
>> +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
>> +
>> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>> +#include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
>> +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>> +
>> +#include "vgic.h"
>> +#include "vgic-mmio.h"
>> +
>> +#define REGISTER_ITS_DESC(off, rd, wr, length, acc) \
>> +{ \
>> + .reg_offset = off, \
>> + .len = length, \
>> + .access_flags = acc, \
>> + .iodev_type = IODEV_ITS, \
>
> ... why isn't this at the device level? It doesn't make much sense to
> have it at the register level (we never access a register in isolation,
> we always access it relatively to a device).
>
> And given that the *only* time you actually evaluate this flag is in
> dispatch_mmio_read/write, there is zero benefit in duplicating it all
> over the place.
>
> Smaller structures, smaller patch. Am I missing something?
And for the record, here's what I've cooked on top of your patch:
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index c64db0f..95eab74 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -112,12 +112,20 @@ struct vgic_irq {
struct vgic_register_region;
struct vgic_its;
+enum iodev_type {
+ IODEV_CPUIF,
+ IODEV_DIST,
+ IODEV_REDIST,
+ IODEV_ITS,
+};
+
struct vgic_io_device {
gpa_t base_addr;
union {
struct kvm_vcpu *redist_vcpu;
struct vgic_its *its;
};
+ enum iodev_type iodev_type;
const struct vgic_register_region *regions;
int nr_regions;
struct kvm_io_device dev;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index 4459a59..7c7d16b 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,6 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_its_baser(struct kvm *kvm,
.reg_offset = off, \
.len = length, \
.access_flags = acc, \
- .iodev_type = IODEV_ITS, \
.its_read = rd, \
.its_write = wr, \
}
@@ -1219,6 +1218,7 @@ static int vgic_its_register(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its)
iodev->regions = its_registers;
iodev->nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(its_registers);
+ iodev->iodev_type = IODEV_ITS;
kvm_iodevice_init(&iodev->dev, &kvm_io_gic_ops);
iodev->base_addr = its->vgic_its_base;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
index bca5bf7..52af312 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
@@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ unsigned int vgic_v2_init_dist_iodev(struct vgic_io_device *dev)
{
dev->regions = vgic_v2_dist_registers;
dev->nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(vgic_v2_dist_registers);
+ dev->iodev_type = IODEV_DIST;
kvm_iodevice_init(&dev->dev, &kvm_io_gic_ops);
@@ -437,6 +438,7 @@ int vgic_v2_cpuif_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
struct vgic_io_device dev = {
.regions = vgic_v2_cpu_registers,
.nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(vgic_v2_cpu_registers),
+ .iodev_type = IODEV_CPUIF,
};
return vgic_uaccess(vcpu, &dev, is_write, offset, val);
@@ -448,6 +450,7 @@ int vgic_v2_dist_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
struct vgic_io_device dev = {
.regions = vgic_v2_dist_registers,
.nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(vgic_v2_dist_registers),
+ .iodev_type = IODEV_DIST,
};
return vgic_uaccess(vcpu, &dev, is_write, offset, val);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
index c7c7a87..d1d2020 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
@@ -346,7 +346,6 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_pendbase(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
.bits_per_irq = bpi, \
.len = (bpi * VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS) / 8, \
.access_flags = acc, \
- .iodev_type = type, \
.read = vgic_mmio_read_raz, \
.write = vgic_mmio_write_wi, \
}, { \
@@ -354,7 +353,6 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_pendbase(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
.bits_per_irq = bpi, \
.len = (bpi * (1024 - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)) / 8, \
.access_flags = acc, \
- .iodev_type = type, \
.read = rd, \
.write = wr, \
}
@@ -465,6 +463,7 @@ unsigned int vgic_v3_init_dist_iodev(struct vgic_io_device *dev)
{
dev->regions = vgic_v3_dist_registers;
dev->nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(vgic_v3_dist_registers);
+ dev->iodev_type = IODEV_DIST;
kvm_iodevice_init(&dev->dev, &kvm_io_gic_ops);
@@ -486,6 +485,7 @@ int vgic_register_redist_iodevs(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t redist_base_address)
rd_dev->base_addr = rd_base;
rd_dev->regions = vgic_v3_rdbase_registers;
rd_dev->nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(vgic_v3_rdbase_registers);
+ rd_dev->iodev_type = IODEV_REDIST;
rd_dev->redist_vcpu = vcpu;
mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
@@ -500,6 +500,7 @@ int vgic_register_redist_iodevs(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t redist_base_address)
sgi_dev->base_addr = sgi_base;
sgi_dev->regions = vgic_v3_sgibase_registers;
sgi_dev->nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(vgic_v3_sgibase_registers);
+ sgi_dev->iodev_type = IODEV_REDIST;
sgi_dev->redist_vcpu = vcpu;
mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
index a097c1a..97bf8e7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int dispatch_mmio_read(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_io_device *dev,
return 0;
}
- switch (region->iodev_type) {
+ switch (iodev->iodev_type) {
case IODEV_CPUIF:
return 1;
case IODEV_DIST:
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int dispatch_mmio_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_io_device *dev,
if (!check_region(region, addr, len))
return 0;
- switch (region->iodev_type) {
+ switch (iodev->iodev_type) {
case IODEV_CPUIF:
break;
case IODEV_DIST:
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.h
index 513bb5c..b6950f3 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.h
@@ -16,19 +16,11 @@
#ifndef __KVM_ARM_VGIC_MMIO_H__
#define __KVM_ARM_VGIC_MMIO_H__
-enum iodev_type {
- IODEV_CPUIF,
- IODEV_DIST,
- IODEV_REDIST,
- IODEV_ITS
-};
-
struct vgic_register_region {
unsigned int reg_offset;
unsigned int len;
unsigned int bits_per_irq;
unsigned int access_flags;
- enum iodev_type iodev_type;
union {
unsigned long (*read)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t addr,
unsigned int len);
@@ -80,7 +72,6 @@ extern struct kvm_io_device_ops kvm_io_gic_ops;
.bits_per_irq = bpi, \
.len = bpi * 1024 / 8, \
.access_flags = acc, \
- .iodev_type = type, \
.read = rd, \
.write = wr, \
}
@@ -91,7 +82,6 @@ extern struct kvm_io_device_ops kvm_io_gic_ops;
.bits_per_irq = 0, \
.len = length, \
.access_flags = acc, \
- .iodev_type = type, \
.read = rd, \
.write = wr, \
}
It works exactly the same way, except that I don't have to type
each and every register. I'll leave you to clean the rest of the
patch! ;-)
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list