[PATCH v4 1/2] clk: exynos5433: do not use CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED for SPI clocks
Andi Shyti
andi at etezian.org
Thu Jul 7 08:39:07 PDT 2016
Hi Sylwester,
> >>> > > The CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag has to be avoided whenever possible.
> >>> > > Use the CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag instead for critical SPI1 clocks,
> >>> > > which enables the clock line during boot time.
> >> >
> >> > I don't agree. Both flags should be avoided. Clk is critical does not
> >> > solve the problem. It is just a better workaround for lack of proper
> >> > clock consumers.
> >> >
> >> > The IOCLK is not a critical clock. It can be disabled (e.g. when SoC
> >> > is used on a board without any SPI device connected).
> >
> > As we discussed offline there is no driver which is requesting
> > this clock. We cannot ask to the spi driver to handle three
> > clocks because the exynos5433 has its own peculiarities.
> >
> > If we want this on the spi driver's side, we need to add a new
> > compatible and check it everytime. To me it looks uglier than
> > just keep it alive.
>
> I took a closer look at what those IOCLK clocks exactly are and
> unfortunately I must agree with Krzysztof. These clock gates are
> closely related to the IP blocks and to me proper approach is to
> have them listed in DT and controlled by the SPI bus driver.
>
> I checked and there is similar pattern for other IPs like I2S and
> other SoCs, e.g. exynos7420.
> Additionally parents of those IOCLK_SPI?_CLK clocks are currently
> wrongly modelled as fixed rate clocks. These clocks really don't
> have a parent until some clock is fed externally to the SoC's I/O
> pin. But this issue could be addressed later.
yes, it's a weird design :/
> I think it is not a big deal to add "samsung-exynos5433-spi"
> compatible to the SPI driver along with a new variant data and
> a flag like "has_cmu_ioclk" to indicate whether a third clock
> should be handled or not. Presumably for now the ioclk clock can
> just simply be enabled in probe(), this way it will be enabled
> only for SPI controllers actually in use.
OK, I will work on s3c64xx driver side, then.
Thanks,
Andi
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list