[PATCH v4 1/3] PM / Hibernate: Allow arch code to influence CPUs disabled during hibernate
Rafael J. Wysocki
rjw at rjwysocki.net
Tue Jul 5 17:38:51 PDT 2016
On Monday, July 04, 2016 03:52:28 PM James Morse wrote:
> Architecture code may need to do extra work when secondary CPUs are
> disabled during hibernate and resume. This may include pushing sleeping
> CPUs into a deeper power-saving state, or influencing which CPU resume
> occurs on.
>
> Define a macro arch_hibernation_disable_cpus(), which defaults to
> calling disable_nonboot_cpus() if undefined. Architectures that
> need to do extra work around these calls can use this to influence
> the CPU down calls.
> The macros should be defined in asm/suspend.h, and
> ARCH_HIBERNATION_CPU_HOOKS should be added to Kconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> * Changed kconfig name to CONFIG_ARCH_HIBERNATION_CPU_HOOKS
>
> Changes since v2:
> * Added CONFIG_ARCH_HIBERNATION_CPUHP include guard allowing
> * Switch to macro approach.
>
> kernel/power/hibernate.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> index fca9254280ee..855a3a2374c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c
> @@ -31,8 +31,16 @@
> #include <linux/ktime.h>
> #include <trace/events/power.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HIBERNATION_CPU_HOOKS
> +/* Arch definition of the arch_hibernation_disable_cpus() macros? */
> +#include <asm/suspend.h>
> +#endif
> +
> #include "power.h"
>
> +#ifndef arch_hibernation_disable_cpus
> +#define arch_hibernation_disable_cpus(x) disable_nonboot_cpus()
> +#endif
>
> static int nocompress;
> static int noresume;
> @@ -279,7 +287,7 @@ static int create_image(int platform_mode)
> if (error || hibernation_test(TEST_PLATFORM))
> goto Platform_finish;
>
> - error = disable_nonboot_cpus();
> + error = arch_hibernation_disable_cpus(true);
> if (error || hibernation_test(TEST_CPUS))
> goto Enable_cpus;
>
> @@ -433,7 +441,7 @@ static int resume_target_kernel(bool platform_mode)
> if (error)
> goto Cleanup;
>
> - error = disable_nonboot_cpus();
> + error = arch_hibernation_disable_cpus(false);
Why "false"?
> if (error)
> goto Enable_cpus;
>
> @@ -551,7 +559,7 @@ int hibernation_platform_enter(void)
> if (error)
> goto Platform_finish;
>
> - error = disable_nonboot_cpus();
> + error = arch_hibernation_disable_cpus(true);
I have the same question about this hunk I had before.
Is it really necessary to do the arch thing here?
It shouldn't really matter AFAICS.
> if (error)
> goto Enable_cpus;
Thanks,
Rafael
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list