[PATCH] gpio: document how to order GPIO controllers
Uwe Kleine-König
u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de
Tue Jul 5 11:04:47 PDT 2016
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:05:46AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 08:42:13AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > This uses the same approach that is already used for spi, i2c and
> > several other controllers to ensure a consistent numbering independent
> > of probe order. This is in use for several gpio drivers that already now
> > use of_alias_get_id(np, "gpio").
>
> Like SPI and I2C, I'm against further abuse of aliases for this purpose
> [1].
I considered spi and i2c the good examples here :-|
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > Linus requested such a patch as part of a change that introduces
> > this mechanism to the gpio-omap driver[1]. IMHO this is better done in a
> > separate patch, so here it comes.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> >
> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.gpio/17399/focus=17629
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> > index 68d28f62a6f4..5dbacc8f094a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> > @@ -227,6 +227,24 @@ Example of two SOC GPIO banks defined as gpio-controller nodes:
> > #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > };
> >
> > +Usually the GPIO banks in SoCs are ordered, that is there is a dedicated "first
> > +gpio bank". To fix this ordering in the device tree use aliases starting at 0
> > +(even if the first bank is called "GPIO1" in the hardware reference).
> > +This is necessary/handy to ensure deterministical numbering of GPIOs and GPIO
> > +controllers.
>
> Why is deterministic numbering needed?
in my case (with a pre 4.8 kernel) it's to control GPIO48 with
/sys/class/gpio/gpio48. But also when using the gpio chardev device
(that will hit 4.8-rc1 AFAIK) there is one device file per gpio chip.
Now consider a user who wants to control/debug direction and value of
GPIO48 (or GPIO2.16 for the chardev case). The strait forward approach
is to use /sys/class/gpio/gpio48 (or /dev/dontknowthename2 with offset
16). I doubt there is a platform where it didn't work like this up to
now and I'd consider it a userspace breakage to force the user to know
that the 2nd gpio bank is located at address 0x53fd0000 and so to lookup
the gpio bank below /sys/bus/platform/devices/53fd0000.gpio/.
On an i.MX25 device I currently see:
root at hostname:/sys/bus/gpio/devices ls -l
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 5 20:52 gpiochip0 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc/53f00000.aips/53f9c000.gpio/gpiochip0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 5 20:52 gpiochip1 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc/53f00000.aips/53fa4000.gpio/gpiochip1
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 5 20:52 gpiochip2 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc/53f00000.aips/53fcc000.gpio/gpiochip2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Jul 5 20:52 gpiochip3 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc/53f00000.aips/53fd0000.gpio/gpiochip3
That is we have:
Hardware name | software gpiochip
GPIO4 | gpiochip0
GPIO3 | gpiochip1
GPIO1 | gpiochip2
GPIO2 | gpiochip3
I bet that's the probe order because when sorted by address (and so
by order in the device tree) we have exactly this ordering. (Compare
with $(grep gpio@ arch/arm/boot/dts/imx25.dtsi).)
For a new interface this is OK, still I predict users will complain if
the numbers used don't match naturally the hardware names. And IMHO they
are right.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list