[PATCH v10 05/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMSELR register
Andrew Jones
drjones at redhat.com
Thu Jan 28 12:10:20 PST 2016
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:51:33AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
>
> Since the reset value of PMSELR_EL0 is UNKNOWN, use reset_unknown for
> its reset handler. When reading PMSELR, return the PMSELR.SEL field to
> guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 97fea84..fc60041 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -477,6 +477,21 @@ static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> return true;
> }
>
> +static bool access_pmselr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + if (!kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu))
> + return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r);
> +
> + if (p->is_write)
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMSELR_EL0) = p->regval;
why don't we mask p->regval here when we write vcpu_sys_reg, and then
not need to mask it every time we use it, like below and in later
patches?
> + else
> + /* return PMSELR.SEL field */
> + p->regval = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMSELR_EL0) & ARMV8_COUNTER_MASK;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */
> #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \
> /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \
> @@ -676,7 +691,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> trap_raz_wi },
> /* PMSELR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b101),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmselr, reset_unknown, PMSELR_EL0 },
> /* PMCEID0_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b110),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -927,7 +942,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), access_pmselr },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 6), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 7), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi },
> --
> 2.0.4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list