[PATCH v10 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMCR register
Andrew Jones
drjones at redhat.com
Thu Jan 28 07:36:35 PST 2016
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:51:32AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
>
> Add reset handler which gets host value of PMCR_EL0 and make writable
> bits architecturally UNKNOWN except PMCR.E which is zero. Add an access
> handler for PMCR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index eec3598..97fea84 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_host.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> +#include <asm/pmu.h>
>
> #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>
> @@ -439,6 +440,43 @@ static void reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, MPIDR_EL1) = (1ULL << 31) | mpidr;
> }
>
> +static void reset_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + u64 pmcr, val;
> +
> + asm volatile("mrs %0, pmcr_el0\n" : "=r" (pmcr));
> + /* Writable bits of PMCR_EL0 (ARMV8_PMCR_MASK) is reset to UNKNOWN
> + * except PMCR.E resetting to zero.
> + */
> + val = ((pmcr & ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK) | (ARMV8_PMCR_MASK & 0xdecafbad))
> + & (~ARMV8_PMCR_E);
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = val;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + u64 val;
> +
> + if (!kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu))
> + return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r);
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0);
> + val &= ~ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + val |= p->regval & ARMV8_PMCR_MASK;
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = val;
> + } else {
> + /* PMCR.P & PMCR.C are RAZ */
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0)
> + & ~(ARMV8_PMCR_P | ARMV8_PMCR_C);
> + p->regval = val;
Should we also be setting the IMP, IDCODE, and N fields here to the
values of the host PE?
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */
> #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \
> /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \
> @@ -623,7 +661,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>
> /* PMCR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b000),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmcr, reset_pmcr, },
> /* PMCNTENSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b001),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -885,7 +923,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 7), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_dcsw },
>
> /* PMU */
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 0), access_pmcr },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index be220ee..32fee2d 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -34,9 +34,13 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
> struct kvm_pmc pmc[ARMV8_MAX_COUNTERS];
> bool ready;
> };
> +
> +#define kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(v) ((v)->arch.pmu.ready)
> #else
> struct kvm_pmu {
> };
> +
> +#define kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(v) (false)
> #endif
>
> #endif
> --
> 2.0.4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list