[PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: imx: Add msl code support for imx6qp
Ping Bai
ping.bai at nxp.com
Thu Jan 28 02:45:09 PST 2016
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo at kernel.org]
> Sent: 2016年1月28日 16:11
> To: b51503 at freescale.com
> Cc: kernel at pengutronix.de; pawel.moll at arm.com; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> mturquette at baylibre.com; sboyd at codeaurora.org; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org;
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: imx: Add msl code support for imx6qp
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 02:07:53PM +0800, Bai Ping wrote:
> > The i.MX6QP is a different SOC, but internally we treate it as i.MX6Q
> > Rev_2.0 to maximum the code reusability. The chip silicon number we
> > read from the ANADIG_DIGPROG is 0x630100. This patch add code to
> > identify it as i.MX6QP Rev_1.0 when print out the silicon version.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bai Ping <b51503 at freescale.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/anatop.c | 5 ++++-
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 8 ++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/anatop.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/anatop.c
> > index 231bb25..9622763 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/anatop.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/anatop.c
> > @@ -129,7 +129,10 @@ void __init imx_init_revision_from_anatop(void)
> >
> > switch (digprog & 0xff) {
> > case 0:
> > - revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
> > + if (digprog >> 8 & 0x01)
> > + revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0;
> > + else
> > + revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0;
>
> Please at least add some comment here to help us remember that this is a trick
> we play for i.MX6QP.
>
Will address this in patch V3. Thanks for your review.
> Shawn
>
> > break;
> > case 1:
> > revision = IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_1;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c index 3878494b..cb27d56 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c
> > @@ -266,8 +266,11 @@ static void __init imx6q_init_machine(void) {
> > struct device *parent;
> >
> > - imx_print_silicon_rev(cpu_is_imx6dl() ? "i.MX6DL" : "i.MX6Q",
> > - imx_get_soc_revision());
> > + if (cpu_is_imx6q() && imx_get_soc_revision() ==
> IMX_CHIP_REVISION_2_0)
> > + imx_print_silicon_rev("i.MX6QP", IMX_CHIP_REVISION_1_0);
> > + else
> > + imx_print_silicon_rev(cpu_is_imx6dl() ? "i.MX6DL" : "i.MX6Q",
> > + imx_get_soc_revision());
> >
> > parent = imx_soc_device_init();
> > if (parent == NULL)
> > @@ -399,6 +402,7 @@ static void __init imx6q_init_irq(void) static
> > const char * const imx6q_dt_compat[] __initconst = {
> > "fsl,imx6dl",
> > "fsl,imx6q",
> > + "fsl,imx6qp",
> > NULL,
> > };
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> >
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list