[PATCH V2 1/2] dt/bindings: serial: bcm2835: add binding documentation for bcm2835-aux-uart

[Eric Anholt]

Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> writes:

> On Monday 11 January 2016 14:57:46 Martin Sperl wrote:
>> > On 11.01.2016, at 13:21, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Please just add another patch to rename the existing uarts appropriately
>> > first, then add this one on top with the correct name.
>> 
>> I can do that with the next incarnation of the patch.
>> 
>> But would that not break dt-source files, that refer to uart0?
>> Is this not considered an API change as well or does this only apply
>> to the binary files?
>
> To clarify: I meant you should change the node name, not the label.
>
> The label is not part of the dtb data that gets passed to the kernel
> and can have any value, including "uart0".
>
> The node name is part of the dtb and should follow common naming
> conventions (per ePAPR), but the kernel doesn't actually care, so
> it won't break anything.
>
> There are cases where a bootloader relies on a particular node name
> in order to find a device node and patch its properties, but I don't
> think this is the case here.

Confirmed, the booloader source I have doesn't do anything with uart
nodes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160127/797abe9b/attachment.sig>