[PATCH 5/7] scsi: qla4xxx: shut up warning for rd_reg_indirect
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Wed Jan 27 07:57:21 PST 2016
The qla4_83xx_rd_reg_indirect() function can fail when it is unable
to read a register, but not all callers check its return value before
using the register data, and gcc correctly warns about this:
qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c: In function 'qla4_83xx_process_reset_template':
qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c:1073:36: warning: 'value' may be used uninitialized in this function
ha->reset_tmplt.array[index++] = value;
^
qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c:1050:11: note: 'value' was declared here
uint32_t value;
^
qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c:902:8: warning: 'value' may be used uninitialized in this function
value &= p_rmw_hdr->test_mask;
^
qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c:895:11: note: 'value' was declared here
uint32_t value;
^
In file included from ../include/linux/io.h:25:0,
from ../include/linux/pci.h:31,
from ../drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_def.h:16,
from ../drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c:10:
asm/io.h:101:2: warning: 'value' may be used uninitialized in this function
asm volatile("str %1, %0"
^
qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c:874:11: note: 'value' was declared here
uint32_t value;
^
Unfortunately, I don't see any helpful way to add proper error handling
for this case, and the failure scenario for rd_reg seems rather obscure,
so this bails out and makes the rd_reg accessor set the result to 0xffffffff
so we at least get a predictable value.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
---
drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c
index 5d4f8e67fb25..638f72c5ab05 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/qla4xxx/ql4_83xx.c
@@ -46,11 +46,13 @@ int qla4_83xx_rd_reg_indirect(struct scsi_qla_host *ha, uint32_t addr,
ret_val = qla4_83xx_set_win_base(ha, addr);
- if (ret_val == QLA_SUCCESS)
+ if (ret_val == QLA_SUCCESS) {
*data = qla4_83xx_rd_reg(ha, QLA83XX_WILDCARD);
- else
+ } else {
+ *data = 0xffffffff;
ql4_printk(KERN_ERR, ha, "%s: failed read of addr 0x%x!\n",
__func__, addr);
+ }
return ret_val;
}
--
2.7.0
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list