[PATCH V8 21/23] perf tools: adding perf_evlist to *info_priv_size()

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo acme at kernel.org
Mon Jan 25 13:08:58 PST 2016


Em Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 01:48:28PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier escreveu:
> On 14 January 2016 at 14:46, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On some architecture the size of the private header may
> > be dependent on the number of tracers used in the session.  As
> > such adding a "struct perf_evlist *" parameter, which should
> > contain all the required information.
> >
> > Also adjusting the existing client of the interface to take
> > the new parameter into account.
> >
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra at chello.nl>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo at redhat.com>
> > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme at kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c | 4 +++-
> >  tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c  | 4 +++-
> >  tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c           | 7 ++++---
> >  tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h           | 6 ++++--
> >  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c
> > index 9b94ce520917..4685a40777cc 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-bts.c
> > @@ -60,7 +60,9 @@ struct branch {
> >         u64 misc;
> >  };
> >
> > -static size_t intel_bts_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused)
> > +static size_t
> > +intel_bts_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused,
> > +                        struct perf_evlist *evlist __maybe_unused)
> >  {
> >         return INTEL_BTS_AUXTRACE_PRIV_SIZE;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
> > index b02af064f0f9..e5c1f2e21f87 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/x86/util/intel-pt.c
> > @@ -273,7 +273,9 @@ intel_pt_pmu_default_config(struct perf_pmu *intel_pt_pmu)
> >         return attr;
> >  }
> >
> > -static size_t intel_pt_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused)
> > +static size_t
> > +intel_pt_info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr __maybe_unused,
> > +                       struct perf_evlist *evlist __maybe_unused)
> >  {
> >         return INTEL_PT_AUXTRACE_PRIV_SIZE;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
> > index 7f10430af39c..cc1c9ce5cc56 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c
> > @@ -478,10 +478,11 @@ void auxtrace_heap__pop(struct auxtrace_heap *heap)
> >                          heap_array[last].ordinal);
> >  }
> >
> > -size_t auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr)
> > +size_t auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> > +                                      struct perf_evlist *evlist)
> >  {
> >         if (itr)
> > -               return itr->info_priv_size(itr);
> > +               return itr->info_priv_size(itr, evlist);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -852,7 +853,7 @@ int perf_event__synthesize_auxtrace_info(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> >         int err;
> >
> >         pr_debug2("Synthesizing auxtrace information\n");
> > -       priv_size = auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(itr);
> > +       priv_size = auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(itr, session->evlist);
> >         ev = zalloc(sizeof(struct auxtrace_info_event) + priv_size);
> >         if (!ev)
> >                 return -ENOMEM;
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
> > index b86f90db1352..e5a8e2d4f2af 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/auxtrace.h
> > @@ -293,7 +293,8 @@ struct auxtrace_record {
> >         int (*recording_options)(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> >                                  struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> >                                  struct record_opts *opts);
> > -       size_t (*info_priv_size)(struct auxtrace_record *itr);
> > +       size_t (*info_priv_size)(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> > +                                struct perf_evlist *evlist);
> >         int (*info_fill)(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> >                          struct perf_session *session,
> >                          struct auxtrace_info_event *auxtrace_info,
> > @@ -429,7 +430,8 @@ int auxtrace_parse_snapshot_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> >  int auxtrace_record__options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> >                              struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> >                              struct record_opts *opts);
> > -size_t auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr);
> > +size_t auxtrace_record__info_priv_size(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> > +                                      struct perf_evlist *evlist);
> >  int auxtrace_record__info_fill(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> >                                struct perf_session *session,
> >                                struct auxtrace_info_event *auxtrace_info,
> > --
> > 2.1.4
> >
> 
> Arnaldo,
> 
> As with my previous email, I can't queue this patch for 4.6 without at
> least a reviewed by from you.
> 
> It has been rebased to 4.5-rc1 here [1] for your convenience.  I will
> be happy to use another baseline should that be more adequate for you.

Adrian, are you ok with this?

- Arnaldo



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list