[PATCH] gfs2: avoid uninitialized variable warning
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Mon Jan 25 07:32:45 PST 2016
We get a bogus warning about a potential uninitialized variable
use in gfs2, because the compiler does not figure out that we
never use the leaf number if get_leaf_nr() returns an error:
fs/gfs2/dir.c: In function 'get_first_leaf':
fs/gfs2/dir.c:802:9: warning: 'leaf_no' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
fs/gfs2/dir.c: In function 'dir_split_leaf':
fs/gfs2/dir.c:1021:8: warning: 'leaf_no' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Changing the 'if (!error)' to 'if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(error))' is
sufficient to let gcc understand that this is exactly the same
condition as in IS_ERR() so it can optimize the code path enough
to understand it.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
---
fs/gfs2/dir.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/dir.c b/fs/gfs2/dir.c
index 6a92592304fb..d4014af4f064 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/dir.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/dir.c
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static int get_first_leaf(struct gfs2_inode *dip, u32 index,
int error;
error = get_leaf_nr(dip, index, &leaf_no);
- if (!error)
+ if (!IS_ERR_VALUE(error))
error = get_leaf(dip, leaf_no, bh_out);
return error;
@@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ static int dir_split_leaf(struct inode *inode, const struct qstr *name)
index = name->hash >> (32 - dip->i_depth);
error = get_leaf_nr(dip, index, &leaf_no);
- if (error)
+ if (IS_ERR_VALUE(error))
return error;
/* Get the old leaf block */
--
2.7.0
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list