[PATCH RFC 01/11] clk: composite: Add unregister function

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com>

The composite clock didn't have any unregistration function, which forced
us to use clk_unregister directly on it.

While it was already not great from an API point of view, it also meant
that we were leaking the clk_composite structure allocated in
clk_register_composite.

Add a clk_unregister_composite function to fix this.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk-composite.c  | 15 +++++++++++++++
 include/linux/clk-provider.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
index 4735de0660cc..f4c38f209594 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
@@ -288,3 +288,18 @@ err:
 	kfree(composite);
 	return clk;
 }
+
+void clk_unregister_composite(struct clk *clk)
+{
+	struct clk_composite *composite;
+	struct clk_hw *hw;
+
+	hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
+	if (!hw)
+		return;
+
+	composite = to_clk_composite(hw);
+
+	clk_unregister(clk);
+	kfree(composite);
+}
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
index 1143e38555a4..fa3dd6ba970b 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
@@ -585,6 +585,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_composite(struct device *dev, const char *name,
 		struct clk_hw *rate_hw, const struct clk_ops *rate_ops,
 		struct clk_hw *gate_hw, const struct clk_ops *gate_ops,
 		unsigned long flags);
+void clk_unregister_composite(struct clk *clk);
 
 /***
  * struct clk_gpio_gate - gpio gated clock
-- 
2.7.0